Actually, I disagree with this thinking in the context of the four-team NCAA regional.
In the current regional format, there is absolutely no difference in losing Game #1 vs. Game #2. What you must do to win the regional championship is the same. So what you do is set yourself up with the best possible chance to win both games. That may involve holding your ace back ... it may involve selecting a pitcher based on matchup ... there are several variables involved here.
Sometimes you must take a risk to bring home the trophy. And that may mean going with your #2 (or some other pitcher that matches up better ... other than your #1) in the opener, using your #1 in the next game. Of course, your #2 may match up better against the #1 seed ... thus you go ahead and pitch your #1 in the opener.
There is not a single correct answer here. It depends on the match-ups and the situation.
Brian
You are thinking of Wilson. Boutte pitched on Wednesday.
I would be uncomfortable throwing Boutte in the opener. I would be thinking about Wilson.
Given the Cajuns' pitching depth, I think the approach needs to be thinking about winning the regional in three games. I do not think the Cajuns can win a regional in four or more games (certainly not five). As such, you go with your two top starters in the first two games ... Boutte is not one of them.
Brian
Boutte only threw 53 pitches and it was on Wednesday. 3 days before.
I'm with Brian here. I feel better with Wilson as well, but if we can win with Wilson, throw Austin in game 2, I think Boutte is a good option for game 3.
LSU didn't get a top-3 seed. That surprised me.
FAU sent to UNC
Rice to Oregon. UL almost certainly to BR now
There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)