Another reason why "it does matter" is that as a "2" we might be able to play a weaker "3" so that we could pitch our #2 or #3 pitcher and save Robicheaux for "you know who" in the second game. We have to stay in the winners bracket as we seem to fall off quickly after our top 3 pitchers.
Sure ... but your reply was in response to someone asking if UL might get disrespected by sending the Cajuns to BR as a #3 seed with Rice as the #2 seed. I think that the only way this happens is if UL is actually considered a #3 seed by the NCAA. If the NCAA feels UL is worthy of a #2 seed, they will not send them to BR with Rice as a #2 seed (making UL a #3 seed) ... because it does matter. The Cajuns would be getting a tougher opponent than they deserve in the opening round (again, assuming that the NCAA does not view UL as a #3 seed). That is, the selection committee attempts to balance the regional.
It also matters in that the #2 seed is the home team in the opening #2/#3 matchup.
Brian
Actually, I disagree with this thinking in the context of the four-team NCAA regional.
In the current regional format, there is absolutely no difference in losing Game #1 vs. Game #2. What you must do to win the regional championship is the same. So what you do is set yourself up with the best possible chance to win both games. That may involve holding your ace back ... it may involve selecting a pitcher based on matchup ... there are several variables involved here.
Sometimes you must take a risk to bring home the trophy. And that may mean going with your #2 (or some other pitcher that matches up better ... other than your #1) in the opener, using your #1 in the next game. Of course, your #2 may match up better against the #1 seed ... thus you go ahead and pitch your #1 in the opener.
There is not a single correct answer here. It depends on the match-ups and the situation.
Brian
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)