Here's a piece telling us what many of us already knew, or at least suspected: Head to head financial comparisons are nearly worthless because of the many different ways that universities handle these numbers.
http://www.teamspeedkills.com/2013/5...=articlebottom
What is interesting was the remark that "The USA Today also makes a big deal about subsidies, but if you read beyond the first couple of paragraphs, you find that "subsidies" can vary wildly from school to school. Florida public schools must follow an arcane state law about sales tax and spending on women's sports that results in a "subsidy". Texas A&M athletics' "subsidy" was an interest-free loan from the school to bridge the gap spanning from when it lost Big 12 payouts to when it received its first SEC payouts. For most schools with a subsidy, a student fee is part or all of it. Those are typically voted on by student governments, so they don't happen without the students' consent on some level."
Also, the remark that some universities take a percentage of athletic donations for the academic side put a new light on T-Joe's alleged theft of $1M from the UL athletinc budget. That isn't to say that I am OK with that move, only that it is apparantly more common than I originally believed.