I think the subsidies for each school are interesting.
I think the subsidies for each school are interesting.
Interesting data. I am amazed at how much some states subsidize their school's athletic budgets. Really, if no school's received any subsidies it would make us look a little better when comparing moneys raised just from donors and ticket prices. Some schools like UNLV and Rutgers are really not that self-supporting and have huge subsidies compared to similar schools where the states are not so generous. I wonder what the best choices are for continued growth i.e. more contributions, more subsidies (probably not) or other ideas?
The diffference may be in assessed student athletic fees.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports...idies/2142443/
http://www.insidehighered.com/views/...spending-essay
Additional interesting numbers (UL is not listed here). Note that LSUA&M's library spending is comparable to that of UC Riverside. Embarassing for them.
Yeah, I am not sure what his point was on this. UC Riverside is part of the UC system in California and my wife got her undergrad from UC Riverside and Masters from UC Irvine.
The only difference between UC Riverside and LSUA&M, is that UC Riverside is a "FINE" academic institution.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)