Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27

Thread: BB 2007: Hosting or Not? NOT!

  1. #11

    Default Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by lifetimecajun
    _ Are you suprised by the selection committee doing this or did you figure this would happen? _
    Surprised yes but "Shocked" no. The one other thing that could be a slight factor is geography. That will play out when we see the whole field announced tomorrow. The Shockers did not have a winning record against the Top 50 and their non conference RPI was only 48th.

    I'm starting to lean more towards geography and facilities as possible reasons. I just don't think the Shockers resume adds up to ours. We were borderline the whole way and keep in mind there are only sixteen slots for 293 teams. The Cajuns have gotten it done all year long on the road so we just have to keep it up.

  2. UL Baseball Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by lifetimecajun
    Are you suprised by the selection committee doing this or did you figure this would happen?
    I am not surprised. I had Mark Etheridge (SEBaseball.com) waffling at the last second (he had A&M and UL ... and was thinking about bringing in Arizona for UL or A&M ... Wichita State was a surprise to him).

    But we both agreed that it was a better than even shot that the Cajuns would be a #1 seed and a host. Now we get to find out if we are a #1 seed or not. If we are, we are probably going to Wichita State ... or Texas A&M if Baylor comes back and beats the Aggies.

    Brian

  3. #13

    Default Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
    _ I am not surprised. I had Mark Etheridge (SEBaseball.com) waffling at the last second (he had A&M and UL ... and was thinking about bringing in Arizona for UL or A&M ... Wichita State was a surprise to him).

    But we both agreed that it was a better than even shot that the Cajuns would be a #1 seed and a host. Now we get to find out if we are a #1 seed or not. If we are, we are probably going to Wichita State ... or Texas A&M if Baylor comes back and beats the Aggies.

    Brian _
    How do you feel about facing Wichita State over there with us as a #1 seed? How is there pitching? Would that be a better scenario for our chances than going to A&M? Any chance we go to Oxford? I don't think Vandy or Rice is likely as UL would certainly be an upper #2 seed if a two. Texas?

  4. #14

    Default Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
    If we are, we are probably going to Wichita State ... or Texas A&M if Baylor comes back and beats the Aggies.

    Brian _
    Who would the other traveling #1 seed be if Wichita and A&M end up #2 seeds?

  5. Default Re: No host site

    I haven't been this disappointed in a really long time...


  6. #16

    UL Baseball Re: No host site

    I will wonder what if what if we had gone to round robin pitching after four innings yesterday.


  7. UL Baseball Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajun90
    Surprised yes but "Shocked" no. The one other thing that could be a slight factor is geography. That will play out when we see the whole field announced tomorrow. The Shockers did not have a winning record against the Top 50 and their non conference RPI was only 48th.

    I'm starting to lean more towards geography and facilities as possible reasons. I just don't think the Shockers resume adds up to ours. We were borderline the whole way and keep in mind there are only sixteen slots for 293 teams. The Cajuns have gotten it done all year long on the road so we just have to keep it up.
    I think overall UL has a better resume than Wichita State ... which is why I am not convinced we are not a traveling #1 seed. Here is the breakdown ...

    RPI (UL 14, WSU 20)
    Non-Conference RPI (UL 12, WSU 48)
    Road Record (UL 20-12, WSU 20-7)
    Record vs. Last 15 (UL 12-3, WSU 9-6)
    Record vs. RPI Top 25 (UL 1-5, WSU 2-2)
    Record vs. Top 50 RPI (UL 1-5, WSU 9-11)
    Record vs. teams being considered for field [RPI Top 75] (UL 15-6, WSU 20-15)
    Record vs. Top 100 RPI (UL 20-11, WSU 20-15)
    Conference Finish (UL 1st 26-8, WSU 1st 23-6)
    Conference RPI (SBC 7, MVC 9)
    Conference Tournament Performance (UL 2nd 3-1, WSU 2nd 3-2)
    Common Opponents (UL 5-0, WSU 1-1)

    The common opponent above is South Alabama. Wichita State split with South Alabama in Wichita. UL won three in Lafayette and two in Mobile, going 5-0 against South Alabama.

    Note that while Wichita State has a better road record percentage wise than the Cajuns, they have also played considerably more home games than the Cajuns. WSU has played nine more home games than road games. The Cajuns have played eight more road games than home games.

    I give the edge to the Cajuns as far as a #1 seed. But I have been saying for weeks that if the Cajuns are not a #1 seed, it will be because of their record vs. the RPI Top 25 and RPI Top 50. The hosting question is obviously related, but a #1 seed does not guarantee a host regional.

    Brian

  8. #18

    Default Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
    _ I think overall UL has a better resume than Wichita State ... which is why I am not convinced we are not a traveling #1 seed. Here is the breakdown ...

    RPI (UL 14, WSU 20)
    Non-Conference RPI (UL 12, WSU 48)
    Road Record (UL 20-12, WSU 20-7)
    Record vs. Last 15 (UL 12-3, WSU 9-6)
    Record vs. RPI Top 25 (UL 1-5, WSU 2-2)
    Record vs. Top 50 RPI (UL 1-5, WSU 9-11)
    Record vs. teams being considered for field [RPI Top 75] (UL 15-6, WSU 20-15)
    Record vs. Top 100 RPI (UL 20-11, WSU 20-15)
    Conference Finish (UL 1st 26-8, WSU 1st 23-6)
    Conference RPI (SBC 7, MVC 9)
    Conference Tournament Performance (UL 2nd 3-1, WSU 2nd 3-2)
    Common Opponents (UL 5-0, WSU 1-1)

    The common opponent above is South Alabama. Wichita State split with South Alabama in Wichita. UL won three in Lafayette and two in Mobile, going 5-0 against South Alabama.

    I give the edge to the Cajuns as far as a #1 seed. But I have been saying for weeks that if the Cajuns are not a #1 seed, it will be because of their record vs. the RPI Top 25 and RPI Top 50. The hosting question is obviously related, but a #1 seed does not guarantee a host regional.

    Brian _
    Troy dropping out of the top 50 RPI hurt us as for as RPI goes

  9. #19

    Default Re: No host site

    I have been watching ESPN2 and have not seen anything?


  10. Default Re: No host site

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Town Cajun
    _ I have been watching ESPN2 and have not seen anything? _
    IT WAS ON ESPN, NOT ESPN 2 AND THEY JUST SHOWED THE SITES....

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. SB 2023: Regional Hosting or Not? NOT!
    By JMV JustMyView in forum Softball
    Replies: 214
    Last Post: May 21st, 2023, 09:39 pm
  2. BB 2016: Hosting!
    By Alum78 in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: May 30th, 2016, 01:33 pm
  3. Replies: 8
    Last Post: May 20th, 2007, 11:24 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •