Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 1 to 12 of 45

Thread: BB 2007: Hosting or Not?

  1. #1

    Default BB 2007: Hosting or Not?

    11. San Diego idel. Must not go 2 and bar-b-que in their tourney.
    12. Virgina game post-poned. Pretty decent shot.
    13. UL won. getting stronger with every win. May need to win the tourney.
    14. Ole Miss lost. Falling out , 2 loses to Arkansas in a row.
    15. Miami won. Small chance, must win their tourney.
    16. Arkansas won. Most likely will host
    17. Missoruri won. Still has a good shot
    18. Clemson lost. Falling out.
    19. No. Car. St. won. Moving up, has taken 2 in a row over Clemson.
    20. Miss St. won. Still in the hunt.
    21. Wichita St. won. Won't move up this weekend, playing # 144 Ill St.

    Geaux Cajuns. Sweep first!


  2. #2

    Default Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Of the above 11 teams, 6 teams will get the remaining 6 host sites. The teams in the RPI top 10 are almost locks. Of the remaining 11, I see San Diego, Virginia, Arkansas, and Missouri getting host sites. That leaves 2 spots left. For the final 2 spots, I see UL, Ole Miss, N. Car. St., and Miss St. fighting it out.

    Brian what do you think?


  3. UL Baseball Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Town Cajun
    11. San Diego idel. Must not go 2 and bar-b-que in their tourney.
    12. Virgina game post-poned. Pretty decent shot.
    13. UL won. getting stronger with every win. May need to win the tourney.
    14. Ole Miss lost. Falling out , 2 loses to Arkansas in a row.
    15. Miami won. Small chance, must win their tourney.
    16. Arkansas won. Most likely will host
    17. Missoruri won. Still has a good shot
    18. Clemson lost. Falling out.
    19. No. Car. St. won. Moving up, has taken 2 in a row over Clemson.
    20. Miss St. won. Still in the hunt.
    21. Wichita St. won. Won't move up this weekend, playing # 144 Ill St.

    Geaux Cajuns. Sweep first!
    Ole Miss defeated Arkansas last night. The Cajuns need Arkansas to win again tomorrow.

    Brian

  4. UL Baseball Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Town Cajun
    Of the above 11 teams, 6 teams will get the remaining 6 host sites. The teams in the RPI top 10 are almost locks. Of the remaining 11, I see San Diego, Virginia, Arkansas, and Missouri getting host sites. That leaves 2 spots left. For the final 2 spots, I see UL, Ole Miss, N. Car. St., and Miss St. fighting it out.

    Brian what do you think?
    This all assumes that the NCAA deems the Cajun facilities as adequate to host.

    I think you are close. But I think you are missing Wichita State as a host. Even as a #2 seed, I think they have an excellent chance to host.

    Locks:
    Rice
    Vanderbilt
    Texas
    Florida State
    Arizona State

    Nearly a lock:
    North Carolina
    Long Beach State

    Looking Good:
    South Carolina
    Texas A&M

    Better than Even Shot:
    San Diego
    Arkansas
    Virginia
    Coastal Carolina (may need to win 2/3 vs. Winthrop to win Big South, lost game #1 tonight - in danger of falling into the lower tier)

    50/50
    Missouri (will host if they finish second in the Big XII)
    Wichita State (needs to win MVC and not tank the conference tournament)

    Fighting for the last host spot
    Louisiana
    Mississippi
    Mississippi State
    North Carolina State
    Clemson
    Miami

    Miami and North Carolina State need to improve their ACC record and go on a run in the ACC Tournament to have a chance at hosting. They will not host where they are now. The ACC should get three host regionals (FSU, NC, and UVA) and may get a fourth (Clemson, NCSU, Miami). At this point, I think they get three.

    Brian

  5. #5

    Default Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
    _ Ole Miss defeated Arkansas last night. The Cajuns need Arkansas to win again tomorrow.

    Brian _
    According to the NCAA.com board, Arkansas came back and scored 3 runs in the 10th to win 4-3.

  6. UL Baseball Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by J-Town Cajun
    According to the NCAA.com board, Arkansas came back and scored 3 runs in the 10th to win 4-3.
    Yes, I messed up what I meant to say (notice I did say that Arkansas needs to win again tomorrow).

    You had said that "Ole Miss lost. Falling out , 2 loses to Arkansas in a row.". What I meant to say was that Ole Miss won the first game (Friday night).

    Brian

  7. #7

    Default Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Mr. Brian u said something that kinda seems strange...Why would the NCAA think the TIGUE would not be adequete to host? We have made many improvements since we last hosted in 2000... Is it just that so have every other top teams in the nation have also made improvements? Just curious and thanks for your insites this season and every other season they are trully invaluable...JMVCAJUNS


  8. #8

    Default Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by JMVCAJUNS
    _ Mr. Brian u said something that kinda seems strange...Why would the NCAA think the TIGUE would not be adequete to host? We have made many improvements since we last hosted in 2000... Is it just that so other top teams in the nation have also made improvements? Just curious and thanks for your insites this season and every other season they are trully invaluable...JMVCAJUNS _

  9. #9

    Default Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    The food and hospitality that our local Cajun folks provide will go a long way.


  10. UL Baseball Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by JMVCAJUNS
    Mr. Brian u said something that kinda seems strange...Why would the NCAA think the TIGUE would not be adequete to host? We have made many improvements since we last hosted in 2000... Is it just that so have every other top teams in the nation have also made improvements? Just curious and thanks for your insites this season and every other season they are trully invaluable...JMVCAJUNS
    I hope you do not have the impression that I brought this up out of the blue. This has been discussed at length by several folks for several weeks ... IOW, nothing new.

    Well, it is both.

    First, facilities have greatly improved nationally since 2000. Jay has noted on several occasions that the Cajuns are in the middle of the pack with respect to facilities in the Sun Belt.

    Second, you mention that many improvements have been made since hosting in 2000. This is true. But there are a lot of problems with Tigue Moore Field and it needs substantial investment to fix these problems (field, locker rooms, press box, and lighting to name a few).

    Unless the Cajuns upgrade the lighting system, they will not be able to host in 2008 when new lighting standards go into effect.

    As for this season, the press box is a real problem. It is not large enough to house the required number of media. In 2000, a press table was setup in the grandstand outside the press box to house additional media. But now there is chairback seating throughout the grandstand. A solution will be needed here.

    TV accommodations are also not up to par. This is much more important than in 2000 as televised regionals are much more prevalent. Several regionals will be televised nationally and locally, along with live look-ins.

    In summary, I am not saying that the NCAA will deem the Cajuns' facility inadequate to host. But it will be part of the discussion and the Cajuns could be passed over because of the facility shortcomings that do exist.

    Brian

  11. #11

    This is so COOL Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
    _ I hope you do not have the impression that I brought this up out of the blue. This has been discussed at length by several folks for several weeks ... IOW, nothing new.

    Well, it is both.

    First, facilities have greatly improved nationally since 2000. Jay has noted on several occasions that the Cajuns are in the middle of the pack with respect to facilities in the Sun Belt.

    Second, you mention that many improvements have been made since hosting in 2000. This is true. But there are a lot of problems with Tigue Moore Field and it needs substantial investment to fix these problems (field, locker rooms, press box, and lighting to name a few).

    Unless the Cajuns upgrade the lighting system, they will not be able to host in 2008 when new lighting standards go into effect.

    As for this season, the press box is a real problem. It is not large enough to house the required number of media. In 2000, a press table was setup in the grandstand outside the press box to house additional media. But now there is chairback seating throughout the grandstand. A solution will be needed here.

    TV accommodations are also not up to par. This is much more important than in 2000 as televised regionals are much more prevalent. Several regionals will be televised nationally and locally, along with live look-ins.

    Brian _
    Gone is saying the obvious, unless you are making real improvements not just cosmetics you are falling behind. The Tigue made serious improvements with the two metal grandstands. The Lourdes park is cosmetic and very nice. We, the team, would have been better served by having the field improvements, lights or other important things happen.

    Folks if you expect UL to stay up with the rest of college baseball, softball, football whatever you need to open your wallets, talk to your friends. It is up to you and me. Improve or fail.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Teams competing with UL for a host site

    Quote Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
    _ I hope you do not have the impression that I brought this up out of the blue. This has been discussed at length by several folks for several weeks ... IOW, nothing new.

    Well, it is both.

    First, facilities have greatly improved nationally since 2000. Jay has noted on several occasions that the Cajuns are in the middle of the pack with respect to facilities in the Sun Belt.

    Second, you mention that many improvements have been made since hosting in 2000. This is true. But there are a lot of problems with Tigue Moore Field and it needs substantial investment to fix these problems (field, locker rooms, press box, and lighting to name a few).

    Unless the Cajuns upgrade the lighting system, they will not be able to host in 2008 when new lighting standards go into effect.

    As for this season, the press box is a real problem. It is not large enough to house the required number of media. In 2000, a press table was setup in the grandstand outside the press box to house additional media. But now there is chairback seating throughout the grandstand. A solution will be needed here.

    TV accommodations are also not up to par. This is much more important than in 2000 as televised regionals are much more prevalent. Several regionals will be televised nationally and locally, along with live look-ins.

    In summary, I am not saying that the NCAA will deem the Cajuns' facility inadequate to host. But it will be part of the discussion and the Cajuns could be passed over because of the facility shortcomings that do exist.

    Brian _
    Brian are we really in the middle of the pack in the sunbelt? I thought that we had one of the best stadiums in the sunbelt with seating,etc?

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. BB 2016: Hosting!
    By Alum78 in forum Post Season and Bowls
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: May 30th, 2016, 01:33 pm
  2. SB 2007: Hosting or Not? NOT!
    By CajunRed in forum RECORDED it
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: June 6th, 2007, 01:15 pm
  3. BB 2007: Hosting or Not? NOT!
    By Rebel02 in forum Baseball
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: May 28th, 2007, 11:24 am
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: May 20th, 2007, 11:24 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •