Ragin' Cajuns remember 2012 ULM series

[Frenchie35]

Yes, the story is about the home sweep, but he makes a statement in the first line that's clearly not accurate. Just a simple fact check would work. That's all.

We would go nuts correcting all the wrong facts on this board. So we just skip over the 5 which should have been 4 and continue to read the main subject of this article which was we lost the last three games in regular season against ULM. That #5 is so close to #4 on the key board. So I will give him a little slack........

[raginsaints]

Yeah but there's a difference between being wrong on a message board and being paid to write stories and consistently having mistakes in it. I think everyone knows ULM swept at the end of the year.

[Frenchie35]

and consistently having mistakes in it. I think everyone knows ULM swept at the end of the year.

Consistently is a little bit of a stretch here and post #2&3 apparently didn't know that ULM sweap the series at the end of the season.....

"End of my comments on this subject". Let's take the series back starting tonight.

[wcd35]

post #2&3 apparently didn't know that ULM sweap the series at the end of the season.....

Huh? Of course I knew that. Where does it indicate that I didnt know they swept us at home. We won 2/3 in the first series, then lost all 3 at home. That means ULM won 4 out of 6 last year. Writer printed that we lost 5 out of 6 to ULM last year. That's all

I'm not saying the guy is garbage, in fact he has put out some very good stuff at times, its just that he could've doublechecked the results from last year. That was my only point.

I really enjoyed his piece on Matt Hicks today.

[CajunRage]

What does this mean? Of course I knew that. Where in any of my posts does it indicate that I didnt know they swept us at home. We won 2/3 in the first series, then lost all 3 at home. That means ULM won 4 out of 6 last year. Writer printed that we lost 5 out of 6 to ULM last year. It was an incorrect statement.

I'm not saying the guy is garbage, in fact he has put out some very good stuff at times, its just that he could've doublechecked the results from last year. That was my only point.

I enjoyed his piece on Matt Hicks today.

This is not the first time he's misstated fact. It shows that either he or the editor is lazy. Have a little pride in your job. I read an article a few weeks ago that had statements that completely contradicted each other and made absolutely no sense.

[CajunFan3406]

Consistently is a little bit of a stretch here and post #2&3 apparently didn't know that ULM sweap the series at the end of the season.....

"End of my comments on this subject". Let's take the series back starting tonight.

And post #15 shows that you didn't read post #2 & #3 very well. I posted a link of last year's schedule that clearly showed that UL won 2/3 in Monroe and 0/3 in Lafayette. Which means ULM won 4/6 last year. Buckley stated differently. I don't get why that is so hard for you to understand. He didn't check his facts, and it isn't the first time. That's the complaint here. Additionally, I'm giving this guy ____ because he can't check his facts before his newspaper articles go to print. Completely different from hitting the "submit reply" button on a message board.

[Turbine]

Well UL needs to win tonight or it will be 5 of 6.

[RaginDave]

I am calling the sweep by the cajuns now. Mark it down.

[Boomer]

I guess the guy has it mixed up but I will say that the stories and the graphics have been just superb----Please keep this going!!!

[GetTheFacts1st]

Remember, if they were better writers they would be at a REAL or LARGER newspaper.

[Turner]

The season is going great, we are exactly where we were a year ago, 2-0 against the Moaners, then they beat us on Sunday and swept us in the second series. A win today will prove last year is a distant memory.