UL Women Drop Conference Series vs WKU

[RedBug58]

Oh My. Looks like we're slipping a little.

[CajunRed]

That second game was just plain ugly. We have...at least right now...ZERO pitching after Wallace. I was excited about Hamilton coming back...and with Martinez and Brown transferring in...but they showed NOTHING yesterday against a mediocre UWK team.

That was bad.

[cajun4life]

We need Narissa Meyers back badly.

[cajunfan337]

We need stef back to teach these girls how to pitch

[CajunRed]

We need stef back to teach these girls how to pitch

I think that would DEFINETLY help.

[Alum78]

It's only softball....a non-revenue generating sport.

[BeauCajun]

Well that sucked. When's the last time we've come close to getting run ruled by a SBC team?

I still don't think we've been run ruled yet.

[CajunRed]

It's only softball....a non-revenue generating sport.

then ignore the freaking thread

[RaginScotsman]

I still don't think we've been run ruled yet.

Not since the super last year. I don't remember being run rled by a mediocre team in a while. That's inexcusable.

[BeauCajun]

And not done yesterday.

[cajunref]

yep, second time you have made that comment.

[Turbine]

It's only softball....a non-revenue generating sport.

Until you have "unused" money sitting in the coffers every sport is non-revenue generating.

Softball generates as much revenue as the entire athletic department generated 50+ years ago.

Couple that with the fact that in 1923 a consensus had the UL Ladies join an inappropriately named "WOMEN'S Athletic Association" and because of that "Women" association they were banned from playing intercollegiate sports for the next 60 years. So that when they started sports up again to choose "Ladies" instead of "Women" was a no surprise statement.

Anyway thanks in part to inflation, UL softball generates more money in year 30 something than football did in year 60 something.

To write it off because it was at one time enslaved to some "Women's" organization is both unfair and shortsighted.

jmo