UL Women Drop Conference Series vs WKU

[RaginScotsman]

I still don't think we've been run ruled yet.

Not since the super last year. I don't remember being run rled by a mediocre team in a while. That's inexcusable.

[BeauCajun]

And not done yesterday.

[cajunref]

yep, second time you have made that comment.

[Turbine]

It's only softball....a non-revenue generating sport.

Until you have "unused" money sitting in the coffers every sport is non-revenue generating.

Softball generates as much revenue as the entire athletic department generated 50+ years ago.

Couple that with the fact that in 1923 a consensus had the UL Ladies join an inappropriately named "WOMEN'S Athletic Association" and because of that "Women" association they were banned from playing intercollegiate sports for the next 60 years. So that when they started sports up again to choose "Ladies" instead of "Women" was a no surprise statement.

Anyway thanks in part to inflation, UL softball generates more money in year 30 something than football did in year 60 something.

To write it off because it was at one time enslaved to some "Women's" organization is both unfair and shortsighted.

jmo

[CajunRed]

Lose the series? What?

[CajunRed]

Btw...every UL sport.loses money.

[RaginScotsman]

Wow. Lost the series. Good bye top 25. I didn't get to see or hear the second and third games. What happened? We run ruled them in 5 in game one and appeared to be sitting pretty.

[phideaux]

We need nerissa back fast.

[Boomer]

We need to get all the ap-cray out off our minds like who is the coach ----Why aren't the rings in yet----Are the assistant coaches still around---and yes better play!!!

[RaginScotsman]

We need to get all the ap-cray out off our minds like who is the coach ----Why aren't the rings in yet----Are the assistant coaches still around---and yes better play!!!

Playing better would be good. This team should not lose a series to a team of wku's caliber.