I think this schedule is just about perfect for where we are, and to further ourselves as a program. And while I don't like the mid-week games, they fall at a good time. Should we win either of the first 2 (or both), we'd be playing nationally televised games (with no other college games to compete against) while being either 5-0 or 4-1 with a win or 2 vs BCS teams. And if we beat WKU, the next week is the same situation at 6-0 or 5-1. Folks, if we get that that part of the schedule with 1 loss or undefeated, the national hype will be in full force. The rest of the schedule sets up nicely afterwards. La Tech played an almost identical schedule last year, catching 2 BCS teams in down years, and found themselves ranked in the top 25. They couldnt finish the job (and we all know of the bowl debacle), but it was right there for them.
I realize people want to see better competition in our home games, but after the last 2 seasons, the foundation has been set. Playing this type of schedule this year is perfect if we take care of our business. Nobody will care about our schedule if we get to 11-1 or even 12-0. Remember, Boise State's coming out party was making it to a BCS game in 2006 (and beating Oklahoma in the January, 2007 Fiesta Bowl). Their schedule that year included the WAC opponents, Utah, Sacramento State, Wyoming, and one game against a BCS team (Oregon State).
So let's not worry about how playing the teams we get at home affects attendance, and instead think of how the possibly of an 11 or 12 win season, being ranked in the top 25, and the excitement that comes with it will raise our national perception, and in turn, blow away attendance records, especially with the glut of home games being at the back end of the schedule.