Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast
Results 13 to 24 of 41

Thread: Basketball & Football Probation

  1. Default Re: Probation

    This makes me so sick and angry. Steve Spurrier can be quoted in the newpaper discussing his team's attendance at "voluntary" spring workouts, and nothing. Ohio St. get penalties overturned. And we get stomped on. I wouldn't have such a problem if the NCAA treated everyone the same. They treat all non BCS schools with such disdain, its not just us. I just feel so frustrated because I love this university and I want the best for it, and I know we deserve better.

    This also brings up another point, in reading that article in the advertiser (read:bull$%^) I noticed comments which remind me of the attitudes of many in this community. They have this negative, "oh what next" attitude about UL. They know nothing of pride and loyalty in their community. If you live in the Lafayette area, there is no reason not to take your family to a few cajuns games in every sport, they are fun. They say "I want to support a winner" I say support your people and they will be winners. Look at the softball and baseball and women's basketball teams, they are all winners. I have my problems with the administration of this university, but no other university any where can touch our spirit, character, hospitality and culture. And by the way we also have some well respected academic programs. Sorry I was long winded, I hope I made sense.


  2. #14

    Default Re: NCAA probe . . . . ation

    I know Jay reported on his show when they first had the meetings that we proposed forfeiting all games played by Greene, paying back a portion of the money earned from the NCAA Tourney berths (I think $20,000?), some reduced practice hours for the football team, and one or two years of probation. As he said it, that would be the minimum that we would be punished with since we proposed it, and that he thought it was a pretty thorough punishment. However, we've been hit with all of that plus the loss of one basketball scholarship in 2008 and 2009. I was fine with our proposed punishment, but I was pretty PO'ed this afternoon when I heard we'd been docked a scholarship as well. Of course, I'm drawing all this from memory so it's far from the gospel, but it's pretty close.


  3. Default Re: Probation

    What does the "2 Years of Probation" mean? Can we participate in postseason activity?


  4. Default Re: Probation

    Quote Originally Posted by Houston Chronicle
    Potuto said the problem with the conditioning program began when the then-conditioning coach made written reports about which players were attending and football coaches occasionally observed the workouts and tracked attendance.

    "Those observations can switch a voluntary activity to a non-voluntary activity," Potuto said.
    So wait!

    The football team is not being punished for a REAL violations but is being punished because the actions of a trainer COULD have turned into violations.

    That is sad.

  5. #17

    Default Re: NCAA probe . . . . ation

    Quote Originally Posted by BrockMeaux
    _ I know Jay reported on his show when they first had the meetings that we proposed forfeiting all games played by Greene, paying back a portion of the money earned from the NCAA Tourney berths (I think $20,000?), some reduced practice hours for the football team, and one or two years of probation. As he said it, that would be the minimum that we would be punished with since we proposed it, and that he thought it was a pretty thorough punishment. However, we've been hit with all of that plus the loss of one basketball scholarship in 2008 and 2009. I was fine with our proposed punishment, but I was pretty PO'ed this afternoon when I heard we'd been docked a scholarship as well. Of course, I'm drawing all this from memory so it's far from the gospel, but it's pretty close. _
    Your memory is pretty good.
    The sanctions we've been hit with is normal for the use of an ineligible player. Some are saying we hit ourselves too hard. Wrong. We were going to get all that anyway, and we knew it. We were really hoping to get away with not losing a scholarship, but weren't surprised that they included it.

  6. I have a Question Re: NCAA probe

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine
    So as indicated by the David Walker quote, I am ready to hear what did UL offer up front? Anything more than a t-shirt purchase by the football players would be too much._
    Quote Originally Posted by HoustonChronicle
    University officials, who appeared before the infractions committee in February, proposed wiping out the basketball records and forfeiting the conference basketball revenue, Potuto said.
    If she had to issue a disclaimer on what the NCAA committee came up with vs what UL came up with, she thought it was overkill.

    Talk about an overblown panic move, OF COURSE THEY ARE GOING TO ACCEPT.

  7. Default Re: NCAA probe . . . . ation

    Quote Originally Posted by BirdofParadise
    The sanctions we've been hit with is normal for the use of an ineligible player.
    Describe normal when the rule was ambiguous at best, conflicting at least, and post violation in clarity.

    Quote Originally Posted by BirdofParadise
    Some are saying we hit ourselves too hard. Wrong. We were going to get all that anyway, and we knew it.
    So let them decide. You/We have no idea what punishment ideas we planted in their head.

    jmo

  8. #20

    Default Re: NCAA probe . . . . ation

    Quote Originally Posted by BirdofParadise
    Your memory is pretty good.
    The sanctions we've been hit with is normal for the use of an ineligible player. Some are saying we hit ourselves too hard. Wrong. We were going to get all that anyway, and we knew it. We were really hoping to get away with not losing a scholarship, but weren't surprised that they included it.
    Couldn't we put ourselves on probation retroactively?

    O.G. has been gone for two seasons and this past season has felt probationary.

    /kidding.
    //glad this is over
    ///looking for better times ahead.

  9. #21

    Default Re: Probation

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunCherokee
    What does the "2 Years of Probation" mean? Can we participate in postseason activity?
    According to what Scott Prather said this afternoon, there is no postseason ban, it's just a period in which - if we commit further violations - the NCAA can look into SERIOUSLY punishing us...talking Death Penalty-type stuff. Hey, who wants to be the first school to get a program taken away twice?

  10. #22

    Default Re: NCAA probe . . . . ation

    Quote Originally Posted by Turbine
    _ Describe normal when the rule was ambiguous at best, conflicting at least, and post violation in clarity.

    So let them decide. You/We have no idea what punishment ideas we planted in their head.

    jmo_
    Big mistake. Had we gone into it with "your rule sucks, we don't think we deserve these penalties," we'd have been hit harder.

  11. Default Re: Probation

    Quote Originally Posted by Sid
    _ i agree with ya'll.

    two more thoughts:

    1.) Our NCAA compliance officer is the one who should be held responsible (forget his/her name at the moment)

    2.) Can we please just forget about this? Seriously, let's forget about it. We were already depressed about men's basketball as it is, so this is not really that big of a deal. let's concentrate on the stuff that's not depressing us and dragging us down. We've got too many other good things goin on to let this rain on our parade

    God Bless _
    It is hard to forget about when the next time the Cajuns are in the NCAAs they media will not include those two appearances in talking about Cajuns' basketball. It is also difficult to think that the banners will be coming down.

    Clearly, the NCAA wanted to set an example re this minor inadvertant infraction, as long as it was not a major BCS program. I can guarantee you that if the Gators had this same infraction last year, the NCAA would not even consider taking away the two nati championships. Same goes for LSU re their final four appearance last year. Same goes for any major program.

    While the program is in such a bad state, the recent success is very important to fall back on. I would rather have post season ban for the next two years than lose the championships and NCAA appearances already earned. The likelihood of this current team going to the NCAAs or NIT is remote anyways, but even if they were the favorite in sunbelt this year, I would rather not lose the already earned championships and wins.

  12. #24

    Default Re: NCAA probe . . . . ation

    Quote Originally Posted by BirdofParadise
    Big mistake. Had we gone into it with "your rule sucks, we don't think we deserve these penalties," we'd have been hit harder.
    Quite honestly their rule does suck. And correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the NCAA committee have to get a group together to explain this eligibility rule to them? If so this should have been taken into consideration at some point right?

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •