Back on topic:
There's an article at theind.com by Dan McDonald that briefly explained how the revenue sharing vote went down. Basically it was every other school vs. Scott Farmer:
This year, with the new regulations requiring the revenue split with the conference, Farmer says UL's total income will obviously be smaller. He was the only league athletic director to vehemently oppose the new regulations.
"The schools that had never been to bowls were all in favor of it," he says. "The schools that had been to bowl games, they all had new athletic directors who didn't know what was going on. I was a one-man fight."
http://www.theind.com/news/sports/12...-to-go-bowling