Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 25 to 27 of 27

Thread: Running backs thin

  1. #25

    Default Re: Running backs thin

    Unless you're a Top 15 team depth at evey
    position is and can be an issue. Teams like Alabama may have backups that are better than most teams starters.


  2. #26

    Default Re: Running backs thin

    Quote Originally Posted by Just1More View Post
    I here ya... but I don't know enough about what was defined as needs in last year's recruiting and what RB talent was available. If you have other RBs in the stable, a true freshman isn't really a high impact on this year anyway. We can talk about depth at every position. We could talk about what happens if Broadway goes down and whether we're in any shape to manage that. And I'll point out again... we have Reed and Harris... and I like both... Qyen can be utilized if necessary... and there are other RBs on our roster. We are not "thin at RB"... only slightly thinner with Montrel out. We may not be all that effective in the rushing department... but that has a lot to do with some other folks as well and how good our staff is at coaching up a rushing attack.

    You can only run one running back at a time. What position do we have right now that if that starter gets hurt, would we not be whining about depth? I just don't see the complaint about RBs.
    J1M, I won't hash it out here on the forum. I'll tell you what I mean when I see you Tuesday. Geaux UL!

  3. #27
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Running backs thin

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaHammock View Post
    Unless you're a Top 15 team depth at evey
    position is and can be an issue. Teams like Alabama may have backups that are better than most teams starters.
    True. But, depth at skill positions is more a function of raw talent. Depth at lineman is talent AND coaching. Alabama is great on depth on all accounts. They are unique to a great extent, even in the upper echelon of the SEC. Coaching being just as big a factor as talent.

    Regardless of where UL stands, the point is that we are probably, as are most SBC teams, more apt to be weakened by depth on the lines of scrimmage. UL has a healthy starting line, a good QB, good RBs, and great WRs. We aren't in a good excuse state at this time.

    We had our best year, last year, with Harris and Griffin producing most of our ground game (better decision making could have Broadway producing just as many positive QB runs as Gautier). Q is a LB. He's better there. Harris and Reed are perfectly adequate for our ground game. If I'm concerned about injury impact and depth, it is in many places greater than RB.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 5 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 5 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. In The Kneaux: The Running Backs
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: June 20th, 2020, 04:50 pm
  2. Hudspeth: I really like our running backs
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: September 15th, 2017, 01:30 pm
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 8th, 2012, 10:30 pm
  4. Running Backs
    By Clutch0364 in forum Football
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: August 4th, 2005, 04:32 pm
  5. Running Backs
    By CajunFan64 in forum Football
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: February 2nd, 2005, 12:12 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •