Running backs thin

[fiz]

earl campbell is 57 years old; do you really want him running the football for us?

[CharlieK]

earl campbell is 57 years old; do you really want him running the football for us?

Hokie Gajan?

[I_Bleed_RED]

You guys need to keep in mind we had plenty of depth at this position. But we lost our "starting" running back in the first game of the season. I think RB is actually one of our deeper positions. We were just unfortunately starting our 3rd string back for this game. This isn't a long term problem imo.

[Just1More]

You guys need to keep in mind we had plenty of depth at this position. But we lost our "starting" running back in the first game of the season. I think RB is actually one of our deeper positions. We were just unfortunately starting our 3rd string back for this game. This isn't a long term problem imo.

I don't think a lot of people consider RB "depth" an issue. Our depth at every position is in a similar situation. We will see whether our entire team steps up in all respects on Tuesday. I hate to get ahead of the immediate, but the next serious test of repairing what I saw this past Tuesday, will be the next away game.

[BananaHammock]

Unless you're a Top 15 team depth at evey
position is and can be an issue. Teams like Alabama may have backups that are better than most teams starters.

[ULGrad@HOU]

I here ya... but I don't know enough about what was defined as needs in last year's recruiting and what RB talent was available. If you have other RBs in the stable, a true freshman isn't really a high impact on this year anyway. We can talk about depth at every position. We could talk about what happens if Broadway goes down and whether we're in any shape to manage that. And I'll point out again... we have Reed and Harris... and I like both... Qyen can be utilized if necessary... and there are other RBs on our roster. We are not "thin at RB"... only slightly thinner with Montrel out. We may not be all that effective in the rushing department... but that has a lot to do with some other folks as well and how good our staff is at coaching up a rushing attack.

You can only run one running back at a time. What position do we have right now that if that starter gets hurt, would we not be whining about depth? I just don't see the complaint about RBs.

J1M, I won't hash it out here on the forum. I'll tell you what I mean when I see you Tuesday. Geaux UL!

[Just1More]

Unless you're a Top 15 team depth at evey
position is and can be an issue. Teams like Alabama may have backups that are better than most teams starters.

True. But, depth at skill positions is more a function of raw talent. Depth at lineman is talent AND coaching. Alabama is great on depth on all accounts. They are unique to a great extent, even in the upper echelon of the SEC. Coaching being just as big a factor as talent.

Regardless of where UL stands, the point is that we are probably, as are most SBC teams, more apt to be weakened by depth on the lines of scrimmage. UL has a healthy starting line, a good QB, good RBs, and great WRs. We aren't in a good excuse state at this time.

We had our best year, last year, with Harris and Griffin producing most of our ground game (better decision making could have Broadway producing just as many positive QB runs as Gautier). Q is a LB. He's better there. Harris and Reed are perfectly adequate for our ground game. If I'm concerned about injury impact and depth, it is in many places greater than RB.