Awesome! They will not regret the investment.
Awesome! They will not regret the investment.
Why this is huge. Consider this. What if 12,000 (my guess at the number of students that take 15 hours or more) alumni announced tomorrow that they were each going to give over $225 annually in capital contributions to the University to further campus facilities. In other words, the University will receive a capital contribution of over 2,000,000.00 every semester.
This is huge indeed. Great news indeed. Now if alumni make a similar contribution we would really be on our way.
Thumbs up students!!!
There are about 200 student athletes. They make up about 1% of the student body. 3000 students represents about 19% of the total enrollment. If all 200 athletes voted, they were 6% of the amount voting. Athletes only did not drive this. The SGA endorsement is what got it passed in my view.
A lot of the "no" voters probably had the mindset of "why should I vote for a tuition increase if I'm going to be long gone to see the improvements?" I guess it's sort of the "where does this benefit me" attitude. They just see TUITION INCREASE, yet most fail to realize that even with the tuition increase, the cost of tuition is still one of the cheapest in the country.
Wow, I am truly surprised. I thought no way this would pass. This is great news!
Boomer -
Also I think the fees were different at each school
The fees at ULM and Tech were different.
Louisiana Tech's student self-assessed fee in 2012 was focused on demolishing three old men's dorms, improving parking, developing green spaces, and creating a new intramural field to replace one that was eliminated when the Intramural Center was expanded recently.
The fee ULM tried to push in 2011 was a $130/semester "student fee" which was essentially an athletic fee with a very small token fee for "campus beautification" and arts programs attached to it. That fee failed. The fees ULM tried to push a year later was a $65/semester fee to create a new outdoor recreational facility (like Tech did recently with their new swimming pools at the Intramural Center) and a $25/semester fee to renovate the existing natatorium into an event center for the YMCA. That fee also failed.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)