True, and I can't blame Tech for liking the regional play for a change. The current bowl tie-ins are good. I've wondered whether the bowl/conference agreements will be changing, however, with the changes in conference members. It stands to reason that simply due to the nature of agreements, some would just remain as-is for the foreseeable future. In some cases, however, I would think the decision of having that agreement at the time was predicated on the member makeup of that conference. I especially think that if you are taking the 4th or 5th eligible team from CUSA, you might want to run some statistical calcs on likely bowl participants and see if this is as pleasing as it once was.