View Poll Results: What changes would you like Bustle and Staff to make?

Voters
104. This poll is closed
  • Change Quarter Backs

    50 48.08%
  • O-line coaching/blocking schemes

    20 19.23%
  • D-line coaching/blocking schemes

    12 11.54%
  • Secondary scheme(zone/man)coaching

    33 31.73%
  • Special Teams focus/schemes

    21 20.19%
  • Offensive Coordinators play selection(too predictable)

    69 66.35%
  • Stickem supplier(fumbles)

    20 19.23%
  • Tackle Drills

    36 34.62%
  • Use Fullback more(at all)Made some big blocks /runs in H-town

    29 27.88%
  • Use Tight end more(at all)made the big catch in H-town

    41 39.42%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: Changes for Bustle to Consider

  1. #41

    Default Re: Changes for Bustle to make

    Quote Originally Posted by RCAJUN90
    Why in the heck did we give him another four years! I see no way of buying him
    out. It might be pointless to discuss a head coaching change but what about the offensive coordinator? As far as talent, we must have had it to be picked by almost everyone to win the conference. Where do you see we lack it as compared to MT or Troy?
    We don't have the DB's MT does, our QB is not as talented as the one at Troy, (he was a JC All American), and our OL is average in the league. Of our six regulars three are walkons. That tells me the ones we brought in on scholarship are not as good as we thought. Our LB's have been OK against the run in most games, but they lack foot speed. Our two starting DB's are OK speed wise, but we are thin there. They are also short and have trouble with tall receivers. We also don't have enough depth there due to injuries to two guys we are redshirting as a result of injury. Being picked first was something that worried me from when it was first announced. Finally, our backup QB is a good runner but struggles throwing. People who clamor for him to play more have not been to practice. Those who have note he has difficulty hitting receivers even in skeleton drills.

    Will we change our OC, I don't know but I doubt it. Coach has said he will reevaluate everything when the season ends. I think that means scheme, practice schedule etc. more than staff changes. I think Coach Bustle had a stipulation in his original contract that he would get an extension with a conference championship. So as you see from all of this, talking about changing the staff is pointless. We need more talent. More talent will come about from a larger recruiting budget and better facilities. We are making strides in that regard. For you guys who live out of town, it is difficult to help as it is not practical to help with the work days and most of you don't have the funds to donate to the recruiting budget. However, we are in a situation where even fifty bucks can help. I understand the frustration which comes through from your posts occasionally.

  2. #42

    Default Re: Changes for Bustle to make

    Quote Originally Posted by Cajunsmike
    We don't have the DB's MT does, our QB is not as talented as the one at Troy, (he was a JC All American), and our OL is average in the league. Of our six regulars three are walkons. That tells me the ones we brought in on scholarship are not as good as we thought. Our LB's have been OK against the run in most games, but they lack foot speed. Our two starting DB's are OK speed wise, but we are thin there. They are also short and have trouble with tall receivers. We also don't have enough depth there due to injuries to two guys we are redshirting as a result of injury. Being picked first was something that worried me from when it was first announced. Finally, our backup QB is a good runner but struggles throwing. People who clamor for him to play more have not been to practice. Those who have note he has difficulty hitting receivers even in skeleton drills.

    Will we change our OC, I don't know but I doubt it. Coach has said he will reevaluate everything when the season ends. I think that means scheme, practice schedule etc. more than staff changes. I think Coach Bustle had a stipulation in his original contract that he would get an extension with a conference championship. So as you see from all of this, talking about changing the staff is pointless. We need more talent. More talent will come about from a larger recruiting budget and better facilities. We are making strides in that regard. For you guys who live out of town, it is difficult to help as it is not practical to help with the work days and most of you don't have the funds to donate to the recruiting budget. However, we are in a situation where even fifty bucks can help. I understand the frustration which comes through from your posts occasionally.
    <>

    I've maintaned the very same thing is true of our starting QB as well. Falsely relying on that arm cost us the MT game, and possibly the championship.

    Where do we go from here?

    How this staff resolves the QB/offense issue for next season will decide if they are ultimately successful here or not.

    If Desmo is as bad throwing the ball as you say, how will we possibly run this offense?

    If we don't committ fully to the option with Desmo, we had better go get a JUCO QB to run a pro-set. Don't you think?

    Otherwise, next season will be VERY bad.

  3. #43

    Default Re: Changes for Bustle to make

    Quote Originally Posted by HOTBOUDIN
    <>

    I've maintaned the very same thing is true of our starting QB as well. Falsely relying on that arm cost us the MT game, and possibly the championship.

    Where do we go from here?

    How this staff resolves the QB/offense issue for next season will decide if they are ultimately successful here or not.

    If Desmo is as bad throwing the ball as you say, how will we possibly run this offense?

    If we don't committ fully to the option with Desmo, we had better go get a JUCO QB to run a pro-set. Don't you think?

    Otherwise, next season will be VERY bad.
    I think the offense will be changed to suit Desormeaux's talents. I don't think that means we will never throw the ball. We will put in some routes that he feels comfortable with. His problem this year may be that he is practicing at so many positions that he can't get comfortable at QB. If he works exclusively there, he will improve.

  4. #44

    Default Re: Changes for Bustle to make

    Quote Originally Posted by HOTBOUDIN
    <>

    I've maintaned the very same thing is true of our starting QB as well. Falsely relying on that arm cost us the MT game, and possibly the championship.

    Where do we go from here?

    How this staff resolves the QB/offense issue for next season will decide if they are ultimately successful here or not.

    If Desmo is as bad throwing the ball as you say, how will we possibly run this offense?

    If we don't committ fully to the option with Desmo, we had better go get a JUCO QB to run a pro-set. Don't you think?

    Otherwise, next season will be VERY bad.
    next year we are going to run a 2 qb set with hundley and desmo. Des will continue to play all over the field. Hundley was the number 1 rated pro style qb coming out of high school. We will be fine next year. I'll tell you how we win a conference championship, #32 Fenroy! we have never lost a game where he touches the ball at least 20 times. i don't understand what is so hard for people to understand. Look no further our savior is here sitting in the damn backfield

  5. #45

    Default Re: Changes for Bustle to Consider

    this kind of question is one of the reason people stay away from games because it gives the impression that the team is losing!!!
    WHY ASK THIS KIND OF CRAP?
    we have a good coaching staff who has worked thru not having any players to compete to one game away from another winning season after more than a decade of losing, i just don't get it, it's like you people been watching a winner and all of a sudden start losing get real people this staff has done and continue to do a great job, so what we drop a couple of games every team at some point go thru this.........all this is, is the old lsu mentality crap the hell with this, it's a shame you people cannot understand this or maybe you just dont want to i say stick it up your "you know what" and i don't care if you post this or not.........................................................


  6. #46

    Default Re: Changes for Bustle to Consider

    Quote Originally Posted by Oldman
    this kind of question is one of the reason people stay away from games because it gives the impression that the team is losing!!!
    WHY ASK THIS KIND OF CRAP?
    we have a good coaching staff who has worked thru not having any players to compete to one game away from another winning season after more than a decade of losing, i just don't get it, it's like you people been watching a winner and all of a sudden start losing get real people this staff has done and continue to do a great job, so what we drop a couple of games every team at some point go thru this.........all this is, is the old lsu mentality crap the with this, it's a shame you people cannot understand this or maybe you just dont want to i say stick it up your "you know what" and i don't care if you post this or not.........................................................
    I certainly agree with that. This air of negativity on both UL message boards since the MT defeat has been depressing people and making them not want to come and participate. Time for everybody to get their flu shot and get well in time for Saturday. We have a two-game winning streak and a winning season hangs in the balance.

Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Bustle
    By CajunRage in forum Polls N Rankings
    Replies: 60
    Last Post: October 6th, 2010, 07:11 pm
  2. We are in the Bustle II Era
    By Turbine in forum Football
    Replies: 59
    Last Post: November 20th, 2009, 10:02 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •