"Laissez les bon ton rouler' or some such.Originally Posted by RaiderInTheZone
Thanks for the well wishes, best of luck to MT as well.
L'Ronte'
"Laissez les bon ton rouler' or some such.Originally Posted by RaiderInTheZone
Thanks for the well wishes, best of luck to MT as well.
L'Ronte'
As much as I love our team and knew how good they were, I never in my wildest dreams even imagined we'd get in as high as #12. To get in, as a #11, and at-large, is huge. I had to call my mother who left the message on my phone while i was in class, to make sure I wasn't having ear hallucinations.
Needless to say, I will make every effort possible to make the trip to Austin for the first round on Saturday. Regretably, I won't be able to stay for the 2nd round game on Monday (that's when it is, right?).
God Bless
GEAUX UL LADY CAJUNS BASKETBALL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Once there was no such word as AIN'T . . .Originally Posted by DestinCajun
Let’s test how observant we are, how often have we seen headlines use the term “Ragin’ Cajuns for men or women and tell you the sport? Very few if any. It’s because they have limited space and now have to make room for "Women" or "Men" to differentiate. There isn’t enough room.
Unfortunately what has happened is to make room they have almost exclusively dropped use of "Ragin" in all headlines and broadcasts.
So how has this universal move towards the term "Ragin' Cajuns" enhanced the franchise? It hasn't! It has had the opposite affect; it has watered it down to where it is now used less than ever.
I suggest it is a red herring if on the one hand we profess a problem with use of "Lady Cajuns" when the better issue (based on professed goal) might be with the stand alone use of the generic term "Cajuns".
If someone doesn’t have a problem with Cajuns by itself I don’t see where they have a problem with Lady Cajuns. Unless -that is- they also have a problem with Cajun Women.
Lets say the headline were to read "Louisiana’s Ragin' Cajuns Geaux Dancing for First Time in School History" . . . how inaccurate! It would be wrong and needlessly undermine the Men's program. It would be inaccurate unless you added the term women or the specific sport.
Not everyone reads articles, and with the wrong headline there will be those who for whatever reason will wrongly conclude that the MEN are in the tournament, thus robbing the Lady Cajuns of the credit they so richly deserve.
jmo
Geaux Cajuns
Consider this:Originally Posted by Turbine
We are the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. We want to be known as Louisiana and get bent out of shape when folks don't call us what we want to be called.
Yet, our women's coaches, starting with Gay Nix and now with Kelly and Stef, want our womens teams to be called the Ragin Cajuns.
Yet we come up with reasons not to honor that request.
Hypocritical, no?
Originally Posted by BirdofParadiseNot in my opinion.
I don't want to box you in, but I hear certain radio broadcasters use generic "Cajuns" by itself all the time.
Good point and now we need Coach Hall to erase Lafayette off his players' jersies.Originally Posted by BirdofParadise
We are LOUISIANA
You've totally missed the point.Originally Posted by Turbine
Our women's coaches don't want the term LADY CAJUNS used. None of them have a problem with Cajuns. They have a problem with LADY.
You don't have to agree with their wishes. But it would be nice to respect them.
Since when did LADY become a 4 letter word . . . oops never mind 1,2,3,4 I see their delima.Originally Posted by BirdofParadise
This type of ad hoc argument should not be entertained."Our women's coaches don't want the term LADY CAJUNS used. None of them have a problem with Cajuns. They have a problem with LADY."
Are the female coaches against a gender clearifying remark to know what team? Can I say female? LOL
GEAUX RAGIN' CAJUN FEMALES KICK SOME MARQUETTE FEMALE BASKETBALL BUTT.
"GEAUX RAGIN' CAJUN FEMALES"
Already an example of what happens when ad hoc arguments are entertained.
I am so excited, we plan on making the trip for as many games as it takes.
There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)