Page 17 of 34 FirstFirst ... 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 27 ... LastLast
Results 193 to 204 of 400

Thread: 2006: UL-6 FAU-0

  1. #193

    Default Re: UL-6 FAU-0

    Quote Originally Posted by rhineaux
    Bull ____! He was averaging 4+ yards a carry. That's not good run defense. You feed the monster and for every play he gets stopped at the line, then there are two plays he gets 5 or 6 yards. If they give FAU a steady dose from the get-go, mixing in Wallace every 5-6 plays, that front seven has nothing left at the end of the game when you are trying to get a first down to tak etime off the clock.
    It looks like FAU use the same defense the Saints use against Atlanta to stop their spread offense.

  2. #194

    Default 2006: UL-6 FAU-0

    I'm sorry, but FAUs defense did not play a great game, as some have said in other posts. It is easy to defend the same play again, and again, and again.

    When you have a 1st and 10 in the redzone, with a 6 point lead, you go for the TD. You don't play for a field goal just to make it a two score game. Edmiston will miss one every now and then, obviously.

    Two things that almost cost us the game
    1- Horrible play calling
    2- Complete lack of effort and emotion

    I love the Cajuns, but that was laughable.


  3. USL (1960-1983)  (1985-1998) Re: THANK YOU DEFENSE

    Quote Originally Posted by laragincajun
    I do not think you can judge an offensive coordinator on one game. Lets see if he makes adjustments on next's week game.
    I agree, but this junk has been going on for a looooooooooong time now. Time for some changes to be made.

  4. #196

    Default Re: UL-6 FAU-0

    Quote Originally Posted by rhineaux
    Bull ____! He was averaging 4+ yards a carry. That's not good run defense. You feed the monster and for every play he gets stopped at the line, then there are two plays he gets 5 or 6 yards. If they give FAU a steady dose from the get-go, mixing in Wallace every 5-6 plays, that front seven has nothing left at the end of the game when you are trying to get a first down to tak etime off the clock.


    Thing is, they stopped us when they needed to. Regardless of the yards per carry average.

  5. Default Re: UL-6 FAU-0

    If you haven't watched the game turn off your sets . . .

    I just saw UL kick a FG

    And then saw the kickoff sail into the endzone. I didn't know he had that much leg. I thought the new tee rules would that less likely.


  6. #198
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: UL-6 FAU-0

    Our defense played very well. Our offensive play calling stunk. I am not going to credit FAU for much of our offensive struggles. We made them look good. That play calling was POOR.

    As a fan, I am happy with the W. Our coaches better not be pleased with that offensive performance on THEIR part. Having a rude awakening at a supposedly "inferior opponent", needs to drive them into full alert.

    You don't improve by back slapping and saying "gee, that was close... but we WON". Or are we ready to accept 2nd, 3rd, or 4th place!?!?!?


  7. #199

    Default Re: National TV Embarrassment

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunShocker
    I'm sorry, but FAUs defense did not play a great game, as some have said in other posts. It is easy to defend the same play again, and again, and again.

    When you have a 1st and 10 in the redzone, with a 6 point lead, you go for the TD. You don't play for a field goal just to make it a two score game. Edmiston will miss one every now and then, obviously.

    Two things that almost cost us the game
    1- Horrible play calling
    2- Complete lack of effort and emotion

    I love the Cajuns, but that was laughable.
    This is the same offense that score 34 points against EMU and 31 points against Houston. You have to give FAU credit, they just did not get bad all of a sudden.

  8. #200

    Default Re: FAU Game Time Info

    Quote Originally Posted by BSDetector007
    do you have to be a poster since this board was created to be with "the in crowd"?

    Nope, I wasn't. But you really need to test the waters before you dive in head first.

    But when it comes down to it, isn't 4-2 (1-0) better than 3-3 (0-1)?

  9. #201

    Default Re: National TV Embarrassment

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunShocker
    that was laughable.
    Anyone who thinks this was a "great 3 1/2 hr commercial" for the program is fooling only himself.

    I can't imagine ESPN (main channels) EVER having any interest in Sunbelt football again.

  10. #202
    Zeebart21's Avatar Zeebart21 is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: National TV Embarrassment

    Quote Originally Posted by laragincajun
    This is the same offense that score 34 points against EMU and 31 points against Houston. You have to give FAU credit, they just did not get bad all of a sudden.
    4-2. Thats all that matters.

    Z.

  11. #203

    Default Re: National TV Embarrassment

    Quote Originally Posted by CajunShocker
    I'm sorry, but FAUs defense did not play a great game, as some have said in other posts. It is easy to defend the same play again, and again, and again.

    When you have a 1st and 10 in the redzone, with a 6 point lead, you go for the TD. You don't play for a field goal just to make it a two score game. Edmiston will miss one every now and then, obviously.

    Two things that almost cost us the game
    1- Horrible play calling
    2- Complete lack of effort and emotion

    I love the Cajuns, but that was laughable.
    Where were you last week?
    Or the week before?

    And might I suggest that you find a player on campus this week and tell him that they lacked effort or emotion.

  12. #204
    Zeebart21's Avatar Zeebart21 is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: From FAU board - WANTED: Receivers for Wednesday's Game!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by BSDetector007
    No matter what anyone says it's a darn good thing FAU was not at full strength or they would have won the game. I don't think I've ever seen anything more pittiful than that so called "gimmick" offense tonight. Geeez that was plain horrible. Sooner or later this season that offense will come back to haunt. It's awfull to say the least.
    just enjoy the ride.

    4-2

    Z.

Page 17 of 34 FirstFirst ... 7 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 27 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 37 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 37 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2006: UL vs T A&M
    By Tuffguy21 in forum Football
    Replies: 269
    Last Post: September 14th, 2006, 12:21 am
  2. 2006 LSU-45 UL-3
    By NewsCopy in forum Football
    Replies: 517
    Last Post: September 11th, 2006, 12:57 pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •