Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3
Results 25 to 32 of 32

Thread: Non-returning baseball players

  1. #25

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    Between the new bat and the roster rules, college baseball has changed.......


  2. #26

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    Quote Originally Posted by Dad04 View Post
    Between the new bat and the roster rules, college baseball has changed.......
    And not for the better...

  3. #27

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    Quote Originally Posted by Dad04 View Post
    Between the new bat and the roster rules, college baseball has changed.......
    I tell ya what Dad. Sometimes I think the NCAA would like for college baseball to just go away.

  4. #28
    Just1More's Avatar Just1More is offline Ragin Cajuns of Louisiana Ragin' Cajuns Greatest Fan Ever

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    Quote Originally Posted by Dad04 View Post
    Between the new bat and the roster rules, college baseball has changed.......
    I know what caused the bat situation, but what caused the baseball roster rules/scholarship restrictions? Title IX?

  5. #29

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    I found the article below about the roster limit & scholarship changes. You can search the web for "NCAA baseball 35 man roster limit" and find a number of coaches comments to the changes.

    http://www.informedathlete.com/the-e...on-i-baseball#


  6. #30

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    I think its 35 on roster. 27 can only be on aid. Remainder are walk on/preferred walk on. Redshirts count towards your 35. That's the biggest hit i think. A coach is gonna have a hard time redshirting a kid that's counting towards his 35 man roster. Ty days of holding 6-8 kids back in the spring to develope, grow, mature, and work on there game for a year....are over. Kids better be game ready as freshmen. and that's ashame. This is gonna put an even a bigger emphasis on signing kids that can come in and play immediately. Misses in recruiting are gonna be magnified. And roster moves like what's happening now....can probably be expected year in year out. I think coaches will reevaluate harder and harder after each season and get rid of dead weight


  7. #31

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    What ever happened to Colton Daigle? I thought he had the best stuff in Fall Ball and was throwning the ball in the low 90's and had a lot of strike outs! He looked like he had closer stuff and I know he was a nice recruit out of HS.


  8. #32

    Default Re: Non-returning baseball players

    Quote Originally Posted by lifetimecajun View Post
    I think its 35 on roster. 27 can only be on aid. Remainder are walk on/preferred walk on. Redshirts count towards your 35. That's the biggest hit i think. A coach is gonna have a hard time redshirting a kid that's counting towards his 35 man roster. Ty days of holding 6-8 kids back in the spring to develope, grow, mature, and work on there game for a year....are over. Kids better be game ready as freshmen. and that's ashame. This is gonna put an even a bigger emphasis on signing kids that can come in and play immediately. Misses in recruiting are gonna be magnified. And roster moves like what's happening now....can probably be expected year in year out. I think coaches will reevaluate harder and harder after each season and get rid of dead weight
    On top of that, with the compressed season you have many more weeks where you play two mid-week games to keep your 56 game season. That puts a larger emphasis on pitching, so you have to keep a larger pitching staff on the roster to not over-pitch players. Over-pitching leads to arm injuries, and you can't bring in a redshirt to help out with injuries.

    The end result is less position players. Last year the Cajuns had about 15 position players on the 35 man roster. You had two catchers on the roster. These two have to catch bull pen for 20 pitchers, daily. This makes them much more susceptible to injury as well. When Strentz went down early to the arm issue, you had infielders having to catch bull pen sessions. Not a good scenario. We were lucky to have Adam Todd willing (and eligible by the NCAA) to help out while Chris Sinclair had back issues, or we'd have had infielders having to catch in regular games.

    As an aside, the APR also came in about the same time, which had it's own set of restrictions.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 8 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 8 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 25th, 2012, 01:30 am
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 11th, 2012, 11:05 am
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: July 14th, 2011, 11:50 am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •