Gotcha. I find per game to be misleading somewhat because of games shortened because of rain, only playing 8 innings in a loss away or a win at home etc. Either way like I said before the numbers are very disturbing compared to the years we as fans perceive as great years.
I see what you are saying Buddy but if the bats had not changed our hitting could be better than those years. Hard to say but the numbers are not that far off in hitting which would lead me to believe that the hitting would be about the same as those years with the old bats.
I know this is hard to read, but the just of it is that the drop from 2010-2011 could be associated with the bats mostly and talent some, but the drop from 2010 to 2012 ultimately has to be talent related. I don't think anyone is denying the fact that our hitting has not been up to par. NA stands for national average.
2010 NA 2011 NA 2010 UL 2011 UL 2012 UL
BA 0.305 0.282 0.291 0.277 0.258
Hits per game 10.4 9.7 10.0 9.0 8.5
Runs Per game 7.0 5.6 6.4 5.2 4.6
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)