so what you're saying is "just win"
so what you're saying is "just win"
Red your heads hurting again isn't it?
Brian, any idea what the RPI is for top programs (top 10 or so). I tried to find last years numbers to get an idea but all the NCAA releases is a ranking
The actual RPI numbers are not published. Warren Nolan published the Base RPI number and the SOS number ((2*OWP) + OOWP)/3. But that service ceased to operate after 2010.
If you look at the Base RPI numbers from the 2010 season at a time a little later than now (after games of 4/11/10), the #10 Base RPI was .6344. UL was #34 at .5798. The Cajuns were only 24-14 at the time (.6316) but had a decent SOS (.5798). A 30-8 record would have given them a Base RPI ranking in the Top 15. A 33-5 record would have given them an RPI rank of #8.
The part of the equation that we do not know is the Cajuns' OOWP. This would be a tremendous amount of work to research and calculate given that I know of no available NCAA softball game results feeds (data file with each game result ... could be in CSV or tab delimited format). And even if you went to the website of each Cajun opponents' opponent and tabulated the results, it would only be good for that instance in time ... and would only give you the Cajun Base RPI number, not the rank ... as you would need to calculate the RPI number for every team to establish a rank. What is really needed is a daily game results data file ... it would then be easy to write code that could publish the RPI for all teams on a daily basis.
We do know the Cajuns' WP and OWP. Combined this is .6760. The remaining 25% is the OOWP. If we were conservative and used a .5000 for OOWP (which I think is reasonably conservative), this would provide a Base RPI of .6320. This would be a SOS of .5094 (probably outside of the Top 100), which is not strong. But as I have stated, I feel confident this number will improve. Using the 4/12/10 Base RPI publication as a guidepost, this would put the Cajuns at about #12. An OOWP of .5400 would provide an SOS of .5227 and an RPI of .6420 ... good for a Base RPI rank of #6 on 4/12/10.
Keep in mind ... this is Base RPI ... not Adjusted RPI (or simply RPI). The bonuses and penalties portion of the formula is not represented. While the Cajuns do not have any bonuses or penalties (Adjusted RPI = Base RPI), teams around them in the rankings may ... and thus the rankings are affected. The publication that the NCAA will release next week is the Adjusted RPI.
As I have stated in prior threads, I also want to emphasize that ... while the Cajuns' WP can go nowhere but down ... I feel that the Cajuns' OWP will continue to rise.
Brian
Accounting for the two games vs. Georgia Tech tonight (but not counting the results of other Cajun opponents tonight) ...
OWP is now .5185 (from .5141)
WP+OWP (75% of RPI formula) is now .6790 (from .6760)
I can confidently say that the Cajuns' OOWP went up tonight. Georgia Tech has played an impressive schedule.
Brian
Update through game results of 3/25/12 ...
While the Cajuns' WP dropped from 1.0000 to .9677, the all-important OWP rose from .5185 to 5442 this weekend (it is twice as important as WP). The result is that the combined WP+OWP (properly weighted) rose from .6790 to .6854.
If I use a conservative estimate of .5000 for the Cajuns' OOWP, we have an overall RPI of .6390 (up from .6343 before the weekend).
The Troy series was big from an RPI standpoint because it added a three-game weighted high OWP to the Cajuns' schedule. Excluding all of the other opponent games since the Georgia Tech series (Thursday), the Troy series brought the Cajuns' OWP from .5185 to .5427. So, despite the one loss to the Trojans, the Troy series alone brought the Cajuns' combined WP+OWP from .6790 to .6844. The play of other Cajun opponents this weekend was responsible for the remainder .0010 increase (.6844 to .6854).
As for the play of other Cajuns opponents this weekend, the following opponents significantly helped/hurt the Cajuns' OWP ...
Helped:
Hostra 3-0 (improved from .3125 to .4211)
Houston 3-0 (improved from .5769 to .6207) * 2-game weighted
Mississippi Valley State 4-0 (improved from .4815 to .5484)
Boston 4-0 (improved from .6818 to .7308)
Tulsa 3-0 (improved from .7917 to .8148)
Note that I did not include Arizona State above because their WP is so close to 1.0000, wins do not help much. However, losses will hurt. Going 3-0 vs. Arizona this weekend only brings the Cajuns' OWP for Arizona State from .9333 to .9394. We will however, get a decent boost in OOWP from ASU adding Arizona to their schedule (weighted as three games).
I also did not include Michigan as they swept three games from Penn State (both single game opponents of the Cajuns). Though the effect is not completely a wash due to the effects of wins/losses compiled against OWPs over or under .5000.
Hurt:
North Texas is at the top of the list, going 1-3 and seeing their portion of our OWP drop from .5217 to .4815 (weighted three games). Of course, NT going 1-2 vs. FIU this weekend will come back to the Cajuns fully when the Cajuns add FIU to their schedule (assuming all three games can be played).
Also, Rutgers, UTEP, Northwestern, and Mississippi State went 0-3 while Winthrop went 0-4.
Brian
The first RPI will be released this week correct?
Based on the data that I have, I was able to reverse engineer the other components of the Cajuns' RPI. We now know the OOWP and the RPI bonuses.
WP: .9677
OWP: .5405
OOWP: .5505
SOS: .5438
---
Base RPI: .6498 (Base RPI Rank: #7)
RPI Bonuses: .0156 (10 wins qualifying for RPI bonus)
---
Adjusted RPI: .6654 (Adjusted RPI Rank: #7)
Without the RPI bonuses, the Cajuns would have an Adjusted RPI rank of #13.
Adjusted RPI Rankings
#1 Alabama (.7000)
#2 Florida (.6879)
#3 California (.6878)
#4 Tennessee (.6845)
#5 Arizona State (.6790)
#6 Louisville (.6777)
#7 Louisiana (.6654)
#8 Texas (.6615)
#9 Washington (.6613)
#10 Oregon (.6561)
Brian
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)