<table bgcolor=#eaeaea> <td> <font color=#000000> <blockquote> <p align=justify>
The list of who could be UL's next president looks something like this:
A chemical engineer now working to create a national wind energy research center in Texas.
An academic vice president with 31 years at the university he now hopes to lead.
A Marine who's commanded thousands of Marines and sailors and is president of a national organization that raises and distributes scholarship money.
A violinist serving as CEO of a campus of 5,000 students.
And the state's commissioner of higher education who's overseen the state's colleges and universities for the past 11 years.
But is one of them right to be UL's next president?
The community isn't completely won over.
<center><p><a href="http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071014/NEWS01/710140371/1002" target="_blank">The rest of the story</a>
Marsha Sills
msills@theadvertiser.com
<!--
"For vice presidents at Big 10 and ACC schools who want to go on to a Virginia or a Berkeley, UL would be a great springboard, but we didn't see any of those people," said Joseph Abraham, founder of the nonprofit Acadiana Educational Endowment. "I don't feel the candidates are strong."
A few faculty members also have questioned how the selection committee went about the business of paring down the candidates and the time it took. The committee met in executive session for about two hours and emerged with a short list for interviews.
The process wasn't a two-hour meeting, said UL System President Sally Clausen, who chairs the search committee as a nonvoting member.
"Individual search committee members have been doing their homework and referencing early on. When they came to the two-hour committee discussion, it was about why certain candidates did rise to the level of an interview," Clausen said.
When faculty questions were first addressed by The Daily Advertiser last week, Clausen was unavailable for comment.
"There is no intention here to be secretive," Clausen said, "because the intent is to try to encourage public involvement. The only reason for an executive session is when you're discussing personnel matters, you have to be candid in your questions and answers."
John Meriwether, who represents the faculty on the committee, could not be reached for further comment, but he stood by the committee's decisions in an earlier interview.
Student representative Candace Urbanowski said it would have been impossible to make the decision had committee members not done their homework before the meeting.
"It wasn't an easy task to narrow it down, but everybody listened to what the public wanted," Urbanowski said. "I'm very pleased with the five candidates and I think any of them are more than qualified to meet the needs of our university."
Ron Cheek was one of the faculty members who's questioning e-mail to Meriwether was sent anonymously to reporters at media outlets in Lafayette. When reached Thursday, Cheek didn't comment further about his statements but rather questioned the "silence" from business and community leaders.
"When a decision that can impact us for years and years to come - where's the leadership of the community? Where's the community leaders? Why haven't they stepped up and been counted?" Cheek questioned.
He said he thinks the university needs, "vibrant, innovative leadership" but wouldn't comment on the five candidates.
There was also complaints that two candidates - state higher education commissioner Joseph Savoie and UL vice president of academic affairs Steve Landry - are marked as "insiders" and have an automatic advantage over the other candidates: Raymond Flumerfelt, director of University of Houston; Karen White, regional chancellor for the University of South Florida at St. Petersburg; and Clifford Stanley, a retired Marine major general and president of Scholarship America, a private organization that awards scholarships to college students across the country.
Only one candidate makes it clear in his introductory letter that he was contacted by the system to think about applying for the job.
In Flumerfelt's introductory letter, he thanks Clausen for contacting him about the position.
Savoie states that he's accepting a nomination from one of the state's higher education regents, Richard D'Aquin. No nomination was necessary to apply for the position.
Complaints that not all of the candidates have Ph.Ds aren't exactly justifiable, according to Clausen.
All hold a doctorate from an accredited institution, which was one of the desired qualifications expressed by the public.
Two of the candidates have Ph.Ds -Flumerfelt's is in chemical engineering; Landry's is in computer science.
Two candidates have doctor of education degrees focused on higher education or administration -Savoie, educational leadership and administration, and Stanley, higher education management.
White's doctorate is in musical arts, violin performance. She's also the only candidate who is currently leading a campus - the University of South Florida's St. Petersburg campus with 5,000 students.
The public had a chance to express comments and concerns prior to the selection meeting via public hearings, voicemail and e-mail.
The business community wasn't absent from the second hearing.
Abraham and other leaders, including Lafayette Economic Development Authority President Gregg Gothreaux were among those who stepped up to add to the wish list of qualifications during the meetings.
Gothreaux said his only objection to the process, at first, was that it was open, but the opportunity to participate in the hearings converted his opinion.
"If it had to be an open process, I think the process has been fair. If it's out in the open, people don't have a right to complain," Gothreaux said.
He admitted that he has not had an opportunity to review the backgrounds of the five candidates, but expects that LEDA's executive committee will meet to do its research and prepare questions for the interviews.
The public will have the same chance when the interviews begin Nov. 12-13.
Clausen said the five candidates have the qualifications to face the public's questions that will come next month.
"We believe that we have some good candidates and we believe that they'll stand up to the scrutiny of public inquiry," Clausen said. "If we're wrong, that too will be revealed publicly."
-->
</td> </table>