Re: Here we go with rumors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MetryCajun
I can only speak for myself but your style of expression is more entertaining than bothersome. Much like Stephen A, cowherd or Bayless you like to speak emphatically and with absolutes to get your points across. Of those three I find Stephen A entertaining and the other two extremely annoying. But, that’s just me. I commend you for being comfortable with your 50% hit rate for correct info. I don’t know you, but it tells me you have thick skin and just want to stir up dialogue to make this site more interesting.
Just so you can rip me later if I am wrong I will make a MAT style prediction... There is a zero percent chance we run the table and win SBC championship. We are still a year or two away from having the athletes necessary to be a G5 power.
Your best post ever. I agree with 98% of it (since we like numbers in this convo).
I speak with conviction, and most of the time, I do it because I'm giving an honest opinion with no ulterior motives. 50% hit rate is actually very unfair to me though. I've gotten plenty right; people just hate to give credit where it's due when they don't like the source. Much is made about my "misses" but no one ever sticks around to give kudos. And that's fine, that's how people are.
Is there more value in "getting it right" or advancing discussions, getting people involved and pushing the conversations that eventually get attention to the Brand? I guess that's for you guys to decide, but it has taken this long for people to start getting it. Being right is very far down the list on things I care about on this site. (Big reason why the morons that question my "track record" and make tired jokes like '100%' or 'rock solid' mean nothing at all to me). I like stoking the discussion and keeping athletics at the top of mind. So many great things have started on this board and have been parlayed into action.
Re: Here we go with rumors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
HOUCajun
Wait, are you saying MAT is NOT Skip Bayless?
I used to think so, but Bayless never uses the scrotum cleaner reference. 🤔
Re: Here we go with rumors.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MetryCajun
I used to think so, but Bayless never uses the scrotum cleaner reference. 🤔
Perhaps Bayless is not an expert at scrotum cleansing like the little man.
I feel pretty certain that we should give the little man that - he has strong conVICtions for his expertise in the area of scrotum cleansing.