MH had pulled the plug on funding the program before Baldwin was hired. It's the reason Stokley got burned out
1-10 and 2-9 the 2 seasons before Baldwin was hired
Blakely and Culley would have no doubt been better hires but the program was already shakey when Baldwin started
Thats an accurate historical rendition.
October 6th, 2023, 11:53 am
CajunVic
Re: Perfect Associate AD
. . . so, there should really be no blame at the feet of Baldwin as he was saddled with a failing program funded only by pixie sticks . . . I mean toothpicks . . .
October 6th, 2023, 12:23 pm
Turbine
Re: Perfect Associate AD
Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunVic
. . . so, there should really be no blame at the feet of Baldwin as he was saddled with a failing program funded only by pixie sticks . . . I mean toothpicks . . .
The budget was increased (meagerly)
Baldwin did not have to perform Athletic Director duties like Stokley did.
Whomever was to take Stokley's place should have been more successful than 1, 2, or 3 wins.