It's pretty easy for a coach who has won multiple national championships to get the players she wants. But, to win it all, she still has to go through the portal. Maybe not as often as Glasco, but she definitely dips in it.
Printable View
Gasso doesn't have to dip into the portal but I can guarantee she isn't going to pass up a great player who wants to transfer to OK. Glasco does have an advantage with the portal that the P5 coaches don't have in that none of his scholarships are guaranteed like P5's are for an entire 4 year period. That's why you don't see the large number of transfers into a P5 program like you see into a G5 like UL. The P5's have to honor their scholarships at the original amount for the entire 4 year period. They can increase the amount of a scholarship, but they can't reduce it below what originally offered. G5 programs don't have that same restriction. Their scholarships are year to year and it's up to the coach as to whether the scholarship is renewed the next year or not. If I am not mistaken, I believe that it can even be decreased or increased at the whim of the coach. If a girls leaves a P5 program, that frees up her money so that a coach can use it on an incoming freshman or use it on an existing player or split it amongst various existing players.
I just learned something I did not know. Thanks. One question. So, a player who goes to Alabama as a freshman, gets a full scholarship for all four years? I was recently told, from a source with connections to Alabama, that freshmen are not on scholarship. Because, it's Alabama, Murphy does not have to give one. Most of the money goes to upperclassmen. But, what you wrote states players get a scholarship for all four years. I'm assuming my source was wrong.
Whether it has to be honored for four years or not, it can still be a partial scholly. Doesn’t have to be a full ride.
Also this commitment to 4 years is news to me to, I find it hard to believe that there would be a different set of rules for teams playing for the same title.
Does not have to be a full ride and rarely is. The rule was established by the P5 universities and NOT the NCAA.
The article linked below does a good job of explaining it.
https://informedathlete.com/the-fact...-scholarships/
Your source is wrong. Was it Alyson that you talked to? I can say that they do like to recruit girls who do well academically because the players can get academic money which allows them to keep athletic money in reserve. And no, not every softball freshman who goes to Alabama receives a full ride. But the amount of athletic money they initially receive is guaranteed for 4 years. For example, if they receive a scholarship for 50%, then that amount is guaranteed for 4 years. Murphy could not reduce it if the girl turned out to be a bust. On the other hand, if she turned out to be a stud, he could increase her scholarship to any amount he wanted to. That amount would be the new amount he would be locked in to for her for whatever time period she had left at Alabama. Also, Alabama has girls that are walk-ons who receive no athletic money. They are receiving either academic money to attend or they have taken loans or their parents are paying their tuition. Alabama typically has one of the smallest rosters in the SEC and in D-1 softball. I didn't mean to hijack this thread and turn it into an Alabama thread. I just wanted to point out that it it easier for G5 schools like UL and others to have higher number of portal transfers every year than a P5 school because they don't have the scholarship guarantee requirements.