Football Staff specULation

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Louisiana84

Is the defensive side of the ball set?

---

Both sides are set up.

Unless they opted out. Then years in the system is irrelevant.

https://www.trsl.org/members/optiona...ement_plan_orp

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunVic

Covcaj is not assuming anything. Norwood has been here so they have seen with their own eyes what he can do.

---

Actually it IS assuming. He hasnt performed in the duties he's been promoted to do. Thus the "remains to be seen" and "we shall see". See how that works?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DannyP

Unless they opted out. Then years in the system is irrelevant.

https://www.trsl.org/members/optiona...ement_plan_orp

---

Thanks, I heard something similar so I'm not certain. But Viator has it at this time, how he receives it later I have no clue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler

Actually it IS assuming. He hasnt performed in the duties he's been promoted to do. Thus the "remains to be seen" and "we shall see". See how that works?

---

When the pressure is on how will he respond? That remains to be seen due to lack of experience, it is assuming that it will work out. I am pulling for Coach Des and whoever he hires.

Has there been an outside hire of yet?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scott Malkinson

Has there been an outside hire of yet?

---

Outside of UL with no previous UL connections? No.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler

Actually it IS assuming. He hasnt performed in the duties he's been promoted to do. Thus the "remains to be seen" and "we shall see". See how that works?

---

OK. At no point did I write that it was a slam dunk the guy, whoever he is, would work out. I originally wrote that I "assumed" that his work had been viewed and, because he was already on staff, certain things about him would be known, such as his knowledge of the position he would be coaching and his recruiting ability. I believe both are the case. I never "assumed" that this would be a successful hire; only pointed out the advantages of hiring a known quantity.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by covcaj

OK. At no point did I write that it was a slam dunk the guy, whoever he is, would work out. I originally wrote that I "assumed" that his work had been viewed and, because he was already on staff, certain things about him would be known, such as his knowledge of the position he would be coaching and his recruiting ability. I believe both are the case. I never "assumed" that this would be a successful hire; only pointed out the advantages of hiring a known quantity.

---

Brother, i def wasnt responding to you. Heck, you didnt even challenge anything I said either. My response was to Vic. As usual, our conversation got hijacked by the same troll as all other conversations on this board. My apologies for any misunderstanding.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler

Brother, i def wasnt responding to you. Heck, you didnt even challenge anything I said either. My response was to Vic. As usual, our conversation got hijacked by the same troll as all other conversations on this board. My apologies for any misunderstanding.

---

Posting about Vic again . . .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler

Brother, i def wasnt responding to you. Heck, you didnt even challenge anything I said either. My response was to Vic. As usual, our conversation got hijacked by the same troll as all other conversations on this board. My apologies for any misunderstanding.

---

And please accept mine for the misunderstanding.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cajunrunner

….

---

His Twitter says RB and WR coach. Surely he won’t coach both.