Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CrappDaddy
I don't need to guess. If you pay attention, most of those came against NWST. Let's see who leads this stat at the end of the season why don't we.
Do you understand the point? How is it that Nixon can overcome the issues around him and run us into a win today? How can you tell that he's equipped, today, to make our offense operate better? I can't say it's Haack or Nixon. The only smart thing about choosing one over the other would be what Hud and Jay "cleverly" conjured up as the most effective set and sequence of plays. Nixon may be better in some / Haack in others. But to think it's a given at this point... no way. Our men over 30 have to succeed today before our men under 30 do.
Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know
Ok, I will finally admit it. I was wrong about Haack. With all the numerous threads about who to start, who is better, etc, etc, we all missed the obvious choice to who the starting QB will be. There is 1 QB in our system that Jay Johnson will bring out his A game for and he should be our starter now. Bring on Gunner!
Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know
I don think many on here are giving credit to what was a very good defense for Akron. They had more to do with our lack of offense than Haack, Nixon, or Jay Johnson.
Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know
How about we revisit it tonight? Nixon looks like the savior to me.
Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know
I dont think nixon is the answer and i dont think qb is the problem.
Re: Ragin' Cajuns settle on starting quarterback — but only they know
The problem is what the qbs are bieng told.
