Originally Posted by
HelmutVII
The quality of construction they are doing is very good. However, it is a double edged sword. They have replaced some very sound and solid buildings (masonry and cast in place concrete) with wood structures. At first glance this may appear to be a step back. However, the buildings that were demolished were very energy inefficient, loaded with asbestos and lead based paint. The older buildings (Baker, Huger and Evangeline) were not designed to be air conditioned and as a result were susceptible to mold and mildew. The new buildings will be very energy efficient. The windows are solid vinyl (very low maintenance and energy efficient) and the buildings are up to date to fire, plumbing and electric codes which should make them more comfortable and safer. My main concern is the long term durability of the building because it is a wood structure. Time will tell. My other concern is that the University has the money to build but does it have the money to maintain. As these buildings age, the maintenance costs will get greater. Only time will tell on that too.
The masonry work on the new buildings is not the same quality as the older buildings. This has nothing to do with the contractor but everything to do with the state of masonry work today. It is very difficult to find brick masons today that are equal to brick masons that worked on the older buildings. They had to import (literally) the masons that have worked and will continue to work on these buildings. There is no way any local brick mason business could handle a job of this size. This is quite obvious with Huger being so close to Hamilton Hall. If you take a very close look at the masonry work on Huger and walk across the driveway and do the same at Hamilton Hall the difference is striking. The new work is not bad, just different, and as good as we can get today.