Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
cajun4life
It was the actual run plays that were called which was the problem. We consistently get stuffed when we try to run the ball wide on the zone stretch.
We consistently maul people when we run out of the pistol between the tackles.
Can’t argue with you there. I even texted my group during the game to say, “I want to see us give the ball to Bill and his first step not be to the side.” I’d be interested to hear Des’ reasoning for the east/west run game.
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JamesTheJeweler
Not necessarily...
So you tellin me there's a chance I was right. ;)
U
Just kidding.
Of course we now know (three years down the road) that he can be a good head football coach.
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JamesTheJeweler
Not necessarily, if I'm understanding you correctly. Just because Napier didn't think he was a good enough play caller, doesn't mean he can't be a good head football coach. You don't have to be a good play caller to be a good coach. That's why there's a whole coaching staff.
EXACTLY. The best head coaches have the best staff around them.
#cULture
#WeAreLouisiana
#GeauxCajuns
#BeatstAte
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunT
I believe some people think that any discussion or question of a coaches' decisions and schemes is dissent. And this should not even be discussed because he or she is winning. Some also say that no one should question a coach because they are not qualified, which is a simple argument to shut discussion down. They almost look at successful coaches like a Deity, a true fan should never question him or her.
I enjoy discussing it, especially with former coaches and players because you get other points of view and can learn things that you may not have noticed during the games. We've had these same discussions concerning Deggs, Marlin, Former Softball Coach and I can assure you it will be done with Coach Habetz eventually. Lord, that day will certainly be entertaining. :)
Everything should be open for debate and questioning. Including poster’s opinions. If you can post your opinion you should be able to read criticism of it.
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Im just ready to go get revenge vs Arkansas State.....they whooped us good last year.
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Policarp
Im just ready to go get revenge vs Arkansas State.....they whooped us good last year.
The boys settling all family business this year.
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CharlieK
Everything should be open for debate and questioning. Including poster’s opinions. If you can post your opinion you should be able to read criticism of it.
…..Damn I hated missing QB Club meets……I remember Nap’s first one saying he just told whatever to the media but to ask him at the meeting anything you want…..think Des is the same…..great questions and great answers!
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunT
I believe some people think that any discussion or question of a coaches' decisions and schemes is dissent. And this should not even be discussed because he or she is winning. Some also say that no one should question a coach because they are not qualified, which is a simple argument to shut discussion down. They almost look at successful coaches like a Deity, a true fan should never question him or her.
I enjoy discussing it, especially with former coaches and players because you get other points of view and can learn things that you may not have noticed during the games. We've had these same discussions concerning Deggs, Marlin, Former Softball Coach and I can assure you it will be done with Coach Habetz eventually. Lord, that day will certainly be entertaining. :)
Funny, this post could be used almost verbatim to respond to how certain players running one of our current American Political Parties try to address free speech.
-dissent is bad
-unless you are an “expert” , you are not allowed to question other “experts”
-otherwise you are spreading “disinformation “
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tdncz
Funny, this post could be used almost verbatim to respond to how certain players running one of our current American Political Parties try to address free speech.
-dissent is bad
-unless you are an “expert” , you are not allowed to question other “experts”
-otherwise you are spreading “disinformation “
Do we REALLY want to go there? I hope not.
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
When a few of these posters respond on this site to people voicing their opinions, thoughts, or analysis, they sound the way Cajun T describes.
“Yoh are Not expert enough to comment;” “stop criticizing the Athletic administration or Martin Hall or a particular program (no tolerance of “dissent”);” I was pointing out that I really don’t think those who respond this way are acting like those at the political level.
It is November 1 : so the analogy is quite relevant
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
JamesTheJeweler
Not necessarily, if I'm understanding you correctly. Just because Napier didn't think he was a good enough play caller, doesn't mean he can't be a good head football coach. You don't have to be a good play caller to be a good coach. That's why there's a whole coaching staff.
If a coach is bad at something (example calling plays) and he hires a great OC, but continues to call plays, he is probably a bad coach
Re: LGT Final: Louisiana 23, Texas State 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by
tdncz
When a few of these posters respond on this site to people voicing their opinions, thoughts, or analysis, they sound the way Cajun T describes.
“Yoh are Not expert enough to comment;” “stop criticizing the Athletic administration or Martin Hall or a particular program (no tolerance of “dissent”);” I was pointing out that I really don’t think those who respond this way are acting like those at the political level.
It is November 1 : so the analogy is quite relevant
I guess we will just have to censor misinformation