New '23 Commit - CB Shad Nkuba II

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Big Buds

It’s really demoralizing as a fan. I wish the NCAA would do something about it but they won’t.

---

About all they can do is go back to the old eligibility rules and that just won’t happen. Further, I’m not sure if the NCAA went back to those rules it could not be challenged in the courts just like the prohibition against being paid and the NCAA may lose that on the same unconstitutional grounds as pay in the courts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunVic

About all they can do is go back to the old eligibility rules and that just won’t happen. Further, I’m not sure if the NCAA went back to those rules it could not be challenged in the courts just like the prohibition against being paid and the NCAA may lose that on the same unconstitutional grounds as pay in the courts.

---

Make the player sit out a year. Fixed it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Big Buds

Make the player sit out a year. Fixed it.

---

Not sure the courts would not rule that unconstitutional at this point if it was reinstated and then challenged by athletes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunVic

Not sure the courts would not rule that unconstitutional at this point if it was reinstated and then challenged by athletes.

---

What’s unconstitutional is your outlook, buddy! Lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Big Buds

What’s unconstitutional is your outlook, buddy! Lol

---

The athletes could argue that the one year set out stifles their ability to maximize income as an athlete. It is not as strong as the Supreme Court case already decided but may not be found to be a stretch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunVic

Not sure the courts would not rule that unconstitutional at this point if it was reinstated and then challenged by athletes.

---

This has nothing to do with the constitution. These are rules to play within the NCAA. So if you play in the NCAA the one year sit is the rule period and end of story.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunT

Safety Depth
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">�������������� ���� ������ �������������� ��<a href="https://twitter.com/BivinesMicaiah?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@BivinesMicaiah</a> is officially a Ragin' Cajun!<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/cULture23?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#cULture23</a> <a href="https://t.co/Omcfg2CIlN">pic.twitter.com/Omcfg2CIlN</a></p>— Louisiana Ragin’ Cajuns® Football (@RaginCajunsFB) <a href="https://twitter.com/RaginCajunsFB/status/1662127591216795649?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

---

Does he have any offers? He doesn't even have a 247

NCAA will not close the pipeline of free talent to P5.

"Free" being others spend tens of thousands to recruit/develop for 1-3 years with literally $0 financial cost to P5 to simply take at will. Even the NIL to lure players is paid by boosters. UL, lower P5. G5 and to a lessor degree FCS are stuck with ALL the player development expenses. The Huge time investment resources are lost with no reciprocation of the cost incurred to me is BY FAR the biggest inequity this current system has created.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hudsheen#Fired

Does he have any offers? He doesn't even have a 247

---

Here's his hudl link. He definitely looks the part.
https://www.hudl.com/profile/10930949/Micaiah-Bivines

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hudsheen#Fired

Does he have any offers? He doesn't even have a 247

---

All FCS offers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mxpxfr690

This has nothing to do with the constitution. These are rules to play within the NCAA. So if you play in the NCAA the one year sit is the rule period and end of story.

---

So was no pay for years. Same could happen to that rule and you can bet some athlete will challenge it.