-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Parrott
_ It was my understanding that Bates was told by LSU coaches that he would grayshirt a few weeks ago. He has not responded to my attempts to reach him. _
Because his parents will take his phone away from him if he does :D
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Parrott
_ It was my understanding that Bates was told by LSU coaches that he would grayshirt a few weeks ago. He has not responded to my attempts to reach him. _
And now with LSU going after a couple of extra players, they sent him a message that he wasn't quite good enough yet for em. Maybe both he AND his parents begin to question their decision.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trigger74
_ Just found this on Scouts, Inc.
They have us at 105 with 22 commitments. Thought we would be higher. Time will tell. _
Dont bother with rankings unless you are in the BCS conferences. We had players that lost stars over the course of a year for very little reason and many that probably could have another star as well.
Just know that this is Bustle's best class ever. Rankings are stupid.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Blake Hollingsworth Highlights:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/kCJCVIVR9VI&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/kCJCVIVR9VI&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
Scout.com is retarded.
This class is no where near the bottom in the country.
We have some solid guys coming, plus a few nice JUCO's.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Realize this, but still gives an idea. Right now we are third in the Sunbelt and the Sunbelt is dead last for all conferences.
Do we stick with the conference that might grow? Do we go back to independent, possible to get more bigger checks and grow? Do we wait for a slight chance of going to a new conference that might develop out of re-alignment? Do we possible go to a bigger & stronger conference?
2010 is now becoming a keystone year for UL and our program, more so than just wins & loses and possible a bowl game.:???:
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
23 out of 25 signed and delivered. I'd say we did a pretty good job of holding onto to our commitments. Great job by our coaching staff!
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Don't worry about Houston Bates. Just read on some Catholic webpage that he is set to sign LOI at noon. Oh well with him and oh hell yea with the ones we have coming in. Great class. Great work!
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
My update on Jarad Martin:
http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pb...Id=personaDest
That's 24 of 25 recruits that have signed.
The only one left is St. Frederick DE Aaron Thibodeaux, who is set to sign at 12:30 p.m. with the Cajuns, per his prep coach.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Trigger74
_ Realize this, but still gives an idea. Right now we are third in the Sunbelt and the Sunbelt is dead last for all conferences.
Do we stick with the conference that might grow? Do we go back to independent, possible to get more bigger checks and grow? Do we wait for a slight chance of going to a new conference that might develop out of re-alignment? Do we possible go to a bigger & stronger conference?
2010 is now becoming a keystone year for UL and our program, more so than just wins & loses and possible a bowl game.:???: _
This post is not very conventional. We really, at this point, have no say as to which conference we "go" to. We have not had the success required to really be a big draw for outside conferences to want us not to mention that realignment of some sort usually must take place for this shift to even occur and that is not expected at this time. Therefore, wondering what to do in conference selection is pointless.
SBC is dead last for what? If you are talking about Prestige, many would argue that the MAC could be considered last and even if the SBC is last, it is clearly obvious that the league as a whole is improving yearly. We are now constantly getting in 2+ teams into bowls each year and that is likely to continue for a while.
Being in a larger conference with better revenue sharing would be an obvious plus but we can't concern ourselves with that since that choice is out of our control. We need to bring in the best athletes, strap it up and get to 7 wins so we can go bowling and start some momentum to moving forward.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zephyr
_ This post is not very conventional. We really, at this point, have no say as to which conference we "go" to. We have not had the success required to really be a big draw for outside conferences to want us not to mention that realignment of some sort usually must take place for this shift to even occur and that is not expected at this time. Therefore, wondering what to do in conference selection is pointless.
SBC is dead last for what? If you are talking about Prestige, many would argue that the MAC could be considered last and even if the SBC is last, it is clearly obvious that the league as a whole is improving yearly. We are now constantly getting in 2+ teams into bowls each year and that is likely to continue for a while.
Being in a larger conference with better revenue sharing would be an obvious plus but we can't concern ourselves with that since that choice is out of our control. We need to bring in the best athletes, strap it up and get to 7 wins so we can go bowling and start some momentum to moving forward. _
You beat me to it. My thoughts exactly.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
This year's class is a testament to how hard this staff works especially in prime recruiting season. Some of these kids require a lot of work and it is a process to stay connected and in front of these guys yearly. To get guys who other programs moved on from when we easily could have done the same is a show of dedication. Bustle and staff were able to go out and get a pretty darned good class considering the hot seat he is on and future contract questions of the entire staff.
Guys like Daniel Quave, Aaron Spikes, Bernard Smith, Le'Marcus Gibson etc.. were gotten because we stuck with the process and worked them and showed them value here rather than somewhere else. Quave entered his senior season being heavily recruited by Miss. St and Southern Miss and landed with us when they left because of potential grade issues that seem to be gone. Spikes was a guy that could have signed at a lot of different schools due to his ability but came here because we maintained a relationship with him and his coach and the situation fits him well. Gibson is a guy that could be playing safety for a big school right now and had he not gotten hurt, would likely not be here. There's a lot of talent that we have brought in that was not initially knocking down our door to come here like LSU has where they basically have to pick and choose. Our staff has to work 5 times as hard as a staff like LSU and they have a fraction of the recruiting budget and make a fraction of the pay. I applaud them and their dedication.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
All of the 25 recruits i've spoken with have said that the family atmosphere had a big role in their decision, as well as the personality of the coaching staff. These guys can relate and reach through to recruits.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zephyr
_ This year's class is a testament to how hard this staff works especially in prime recruiting season. Some of these kids require a lot of work and it is a process to stay connected and in front of these guys yearly. To get guys who other programs moved on from when we easily could have done the same is a show of dedication. Bustle and staff were able to go out and get a pretty darned good class considering the hot seat he is on and future contract questions of the entire staff.
Guys like Daniel Quave, Aaron Spikes, Bernard Smith, Le'Marcus Gibson etc.. were gotten because we stuck with the process and worked them and showed them value here rather than somewhere else. Quave entered his senior season being heavily recruited by Miss. St and Southern Miss and landed with us when they left because of potential grade issues that seem to be gone. Spikes was a guy that could have signed at a lot of different schools due to his ability but came here because we maintained a relationship with him and his coach and the situation fits him well. Gibson is a guy that could be playing safety for a big school right now and had he not gotten hurt, would likely not be here. There's a lot of talent that we have brought in that was not initially knocking down our door to come here like LSU has where they basically have to pick and choose. Our staff has to work 5 times as hard as a staff like LSU and they have a fraction of the recruiting budget and make a fraction of the pay. I applaud them and their dedication. _
Well said. I couldn't be more satisfied with this group. There is no question that this is the most complete, and mabye most talented class we've had here in the Bustle era. Can't wait to see these guys in person.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
1210 AM in Baton Rouge is reporting that Bates will greyshirt at LSU. It's been confirmed. :(
Oh well, I'm still really excited about who we got!
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Does it really matter?? We didn't have a scholarship open for him anyway. Hope he enjoys sitting in the bleachers with mommy and daddy watching the tigers under those Saturday night lights. :)
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
T-Joe
_ Does it really matter?? We didn't have a scholarship open for him anyway. Hope he enjoys sitting in the bleachers with mommy and daddy watching the tigers under those Saturday night lights. :) _
He and Josh Johns will have great careers sitting the bench for 4 years:rolleyes:
Coulda have started for 2-3 years here, and had a chance to make names for themselves. I will never understand this...
Oh well, bring on the new recruits!
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zephyr
_ This year's class is a testament to how hard this staff works especially in prime recruiting season. Some of these kids require a lot of work and it is a process to stay connected and in front of these guys yearly. To get guys who other programs moved on from when we easily could have done the same is a show of dedication. Bustle and staff were able to go out and get a pretty darned good class considering the hot seat he is on and future contract questions of the entire staff.
Guys like Daniel Quave, Aaron Spikes, Bernard Smith, Le'Marcus Gibson etc.. were gotten because we stuck with the process and worked them and showed them value here rather than somewhere else. Quave entered his senior season being heavily recruited by Miss. St and Southern Miss and landed with us when they left because of potential grade issues that seem to be gone. Spikes was a guy that could have signed at a lot of different schools due to his ability but came here because we maintained a relationship with him and his coach and the situation fits him well. Gibson is a guy that could be playing safety for a big school right now and had he not gotten hurt, would likely not be here. There's a lot of talent that we have brought in that was not initially knocking down our door to come here like LSU has where they basically have to pick and choose. Our staff has to work 5 times as hard as a staff like LSU and they have a fraction of the recruiting budget and make a fraction of the pay. I applaud them and their dedication. _
This is really a good class. I'm glad we are feeling much better about this class. Someone posted this a couple of weeks ago.
"IMO, this is a very unexciting class with the exception of a JUCO and a transfer."
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
My blog with an update and comments from Aaron Thibodeaux:
http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pb...Id=personaDest
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Yes and No FooFoo..........There is no sure things with recruits or even with the ones we have coming in. Lot's of (Great players in Highschool) are bust in college and the other way around. Let's just hope we can have a few of these guys contribute immediately and the rest have solid careers. Thats all we can reasonably ask for. In any event it appears to be a great class. Personally, I think its the best so far(on paper). Time will tell........
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
foofoochaisson
_ He and Josh Johns will have great careers sitting the bench for 4 years:rolleyes:
Coulda have started for 2-3 years here, and had a chance to make names for themselves. I will never understand this...
Oh well, bring on the new recruits! _
This tells you how good of a program LSU has. I understand it clearly.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
T-Joe
_ Yes and No FooFoo..........There is no sure things with recruits or even with the ones we have coming in. Lot's of (Great players in Highschool) are bust in college and the other way around. Let's just hope we can have a few of these guys contribute immediately and the rest have solid careers. Thats all we can reasonably ask for. In any event it appears to be a great class. Personally, I think its the best so far(on paper). Time will tell........ _
Along these lines, who played last year as freshmen and will return and who redshirted and will be RS Freshmen that we will count on to play??????
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Quote:
Originally Posted by
T-Joe
_ Yes and No FooFoo..........There is no sure things with recruits or even with the ones we have coming in. Lot's of (Great players in Highschool) are bust in college and the other way around. Let's just hope we can have a few of these guys contribute immediately and the rest have solid careers. Thats all we can reasonably ask for. In any event it appears to be a great class. Personally, I think its the best so far(on paper). Time will tell........ _
My comment was tongue in cheek. A few of us really wanted Bates and Johns. I was just making myself feel better about losing those two.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
Javon Lawson really came on midway through the season, so I think it's reasonable to expect him to have a sgnificant comtribution next season.
-
Re: Parrott Blog: Running thread on UL's recruiting
WR Javone Lawson was the lone true freshman to play in 2009. (RB Rob Walker would have played if not for the academic issues.)
CB Melvin White signed in 2008 but sat out one year to become eligible and was a sophomore this past season.
UL's four 2009 junior college recruits - DT Jordan Topp, DL Tyrell Gaddies, WR Andrew Joseph and WR Vernon Wolfe - all played as well.
The coaches had a lot of good things to say about DL Brandon McCray, LB Andrew Hebert and LB Brandon Nash. The thing is that what happened last fall won't matter near as much as what happens over the next few months.
The picture will be a little cleared once spring drills get here.