Not sure what you’re not understanding. Again, student athletes were not part of the discussion. It was students. There is a difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by JMV JustMyView
Printable View
Not sure what you’re not understanding. Again, student athletes were not part of the discussion. It was students. There is a difference.Quote:
Originally Posted by JMV JustMyView
And the most gifted already knows the name(s) of the universities they want to attend. Well known athletics or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbine
Do you think that UL doesn't have bright and talented student-athletes? Answer the question!Quote:
Originally Posted by lafman1
It only took 58+ years to be ebullient for the 1st time. At current pace of R&D growth.....this will likely be an annual ebulliency outbreak.
Just a decade away from passing half billion mark for R&D.
Don't stop getting your name out their because a certain demographic has their mind predetermined.Quote:
Originally Posted by lafman1
The Ivy league used athletics in the late 1800's and early 1900s to create awarness.
Nothing has changed, athletics is the only way you get name recognition which in turn makes selling a known entity, much much easier.
I didn’t say to stop. But marketing athletics to the upper echelons of academia has no bearing on their school(s) of choice. Everyone else. Sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbine
Post#23...Still waiting............Quote:
Originally Posted by lafman1
Well you should know UL has a lot of valedictorians, salutatorians and top tier students from all over the state, country and world. Some are even athletes who play for UL.
UNO is less than $20M with Tech under $30M. And these are the number two and three in the ULS. UL is way ahead of everyone else.
Total research?Quote:
Originally Posted by DocRaginCajun