Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Rebel02
He was serious. But as usual, he rushed to judgement.
Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
Quote:
Originally Posted by
ManAboutTown
You folks that are able, tune in to the SEC network right now. Hate to say it, but that's a respectable SBC defense.
Kentucky - 48
Hoax - 14
Enough said!
Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
MAT isn't loving on the Hoax, he is loving on the fact that they go balls to the wall defensively on every play until they run out of gas or depth. I applaud them for that, as well, and believe that that is a very large part of the reason they have had any success at all.
Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
Quote:
Originally Posted by
VObserver
MAT isn't loving on the Hoax, he is loving on the fact that they go balls to the wall defensively on every play until they run out of gas or depth. I applaud them for that, as well, and believe that that is a very large part of the reason they have had any success at all.
And if we went balls to the wall and ran out of gas in the 3rd qtr, people would be _____ing about how we aren't conditioned enough....
Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunRage
And if we went balls to the wall and ran out of gas in the 3rd qtr, people would be _____ing about how we aren't conditioned enough....
People always will find something to btich about. The trick is to not run out of gas. With our DL depth, that should be much less of an issue than it is for the hoax.
Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Cajunjeb
I think it's a smart move. Why does something have to be reserved for the business world? As Luke Johnson said in his chat. A fresh set of eyes would be best. A different perspective. That's being responsible. That's what an owner does who cares about his business. Hud knows what he has here is special and it looks like he is doing the smart, responsible thing.
I guess I'm looking at it from the perspective that having multiple defensive coaches, we would be able to see what our problems are from watching film and comparing to what schemes we are running. I don't think its as hard as we're making it out to be. Sure, I guess having another set of eyes to see what we are doing wrong is always welcomed but I question why we can't see it from our own coaches eyes. In the end, if it helps out great but I just question why it is required,especially since many of our problems seem to be pretty straight forward.
Re: UL adds defensive consultant to staff
Quote:
Originally Posted by
zephyr
I guess I'm looking at it from the perspective that having multiple defensive coaches, we would be able to see what our problems are from watching film and comparing to what schemes we are running. I don't think its as hard as we're making it out to be. Sure, I guess having another set of eyes to see what we are doing wrong is always welcomed but I question why we can't see it from our own coaches eyes. In the end, if it helps out great but I just question why it is required,especially since many of our problems seem to be pretty straight forward.
To put into one word the only reason bringing in an outside consultant makes sense is ... Trust.
To expand on that one word, Hud and the consultant have a longstanding relationship based on ... winning.