Realignment Question

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunT

The problem is we will not get an extra $5M in TV revenue because all of the most recent new members are not getting the same amount of Legacy members. It's less money than $7M. This is where Turbine and others are wrong.

---

I'm not wrong about what the SBC is paying, and I didn't make a claim on what Louisiana would get, just what current members are getting.

But I can see how my statement implied that.

There’s a possible drug epidemic in Lake Charles. Travel partner…Tommy Mac’s roots run deep.

https://www.americanpress.com/2024/1...3VipE4DRol1EEQ

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZoomZoom

There’s a possible drug epidemic in Lake Charles. Travel partner…Tommy Mac’s roots run deep.

https://www.americanpress.com/2024/1...3VipE4DRol1EEQ

---

Please make it stop. We don’t need another fbs team in Louisiana. 5 is plenty, maybe too many.

McNeese would pair well with LaTech in Cusa…will be fun to watch those two.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunNation

The money would be better, but not that much. However, the current TV contracts are not, at all, why I think we should pursue this if there is an opening.

Go back and look at the 2 groups of schools I listed. That is all it's about for me. It's obvious as to where we belong for the long term health and growth of our ENTIRE university.

---

Yes, and all those schools have student fees. Our fanbase isn't willing to pay more money into athletics, the message has been consistent on this site. Also, you even admitted that the difference between the two conferences media deals will be not much different in the near future. I agree with that, especially after the PAC 12 is officially a G5 conference. Unless the money changes for new members and the AAC actually reaches out to UL, there is no need to leave the SBC. Maggard is pretty much still talking with many of these programs about the next movement below the P5.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Turbine

I'm not wrong about what the SBC is paying, and I didn't make a claim on what Louisiana would get, just what current members are getting.

But I can see how my statement implied that.

---

He asked you how much each ACC member gets $7M-$8M? You answered "$1.1 million per conference game." That implies each member is getting that per conference game. They are not, the most important number is the actual payout for each member.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunT

Yes, and all those schools have student fees. Our fanbase isn't willing to pay more money into athletics... .

---

Except for parents of current students, I think the fan base would more than support student fees for athletics.

Its currently prohibited in the State.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunT

He asked you how much each ACC member gets $7M-$8M? You answered "$1.1 million per conference game." That implies each member is getting that per conference game. They are not, the most important number is the actual payout for each member.

---

Hey thanks, I did it again.

I used 6 as my base, number of conference games.

Its 8 not 6.

It actually comes out to where the Sunbelt pays $312,500 to every school per number of conference games.

AAC members get just under a million.

$300,000 is what Bustle used to get for money games.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Turbine

Except for parents of current students, I think the fan base would more than support student fees for athletics.

Its currently prohibited in the State.

---

Student athletic fees are not prohibited. The fee must go before a vote by the students. If passed it can be implemented, but my assumption is if it were to pass the university would reduce its direct support by the same amount.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajun4life

Student athletic fees are not prohibited. The fee must go before a vote by the students. If passed it can be implemented, but my assumption is if it were to pass the university would reduce its direct support by the same amount.

---

If a student fee has to be voted these days on its as good as prohibited.

Prohibitive would have been a better word.

Can you imagine if tuition was voted on by the paying party?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ZoomZoom

There’s a possible drug epidemic in Lake Charles. Travel partner…Tommy Mac’s roots run deep.

https://www.americanpress.com/2024/1...3VipE4DRol1EEQ

---

They need to find a way to double their athletic budget before dreaming of moving up to FBS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunNation

Athletic budgets in millions:https://ope.ed.gov/athletics/#/institution/search


64 - Memphis (AAC)
52 - Rice (AAC)
50 - North Texas (AAC)
47 - Tulsa (AAC)
45 - UTSA (AAC)
43 - Texas State (SBC)
43 - Tulane (AAC)
43 - UAB (AAC)
39 - Louisiana (SBC)
34 - Wichita State (AAC)


29 - Troy (SBC)
28 - South Alabama (SBC)
28 - Louisiana Tech (CUSA)
28 - Southern Miss (SBC)
24 - Arkansas State (SBC)
22 - Sam Houston State (CUSA)
22 - Jacksonville State (CUSA)
19 - ULM (SBC)



One of these groups of schools will be our forever home. Where do you want to be?

---

You make a very good point sir. And if I may add to your list Army & Navy though not from a budget standpoint. Everyone should be reminded how much national media attention and nationwide following our service academies bring, at least to football. The AAC is lucky to have both of them. UL would be lucky to be associated with Army & Navy even though both are geographically distant from Louisiana.

The SBC is probably in as good a shape as its ever been. UL has a lot to do with SBC building up over time. No matter, the AAC revenue ceiling remains higher than the SBC ceiling.