Printable View
It seems like the (smaller) schools go with Addidas, i am sure there equipment is cheaper then say Nike or UA, seems like more big time programs use Nike or UA thats thats what i assume why.Quote:
Originally Posted by CAJUNSby90
Like Michigan, Oklahoma have that Jordan Emblem, which i assume is Nike top of the line. The Jordan Brand.
The Brands pay the schools to wear the gear. I believe the decision will come down to which brand will offer UL more money but also providing quality product.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragin9221
That i didnt know, i assume we pay for our equipment. Figure the big programs those companies pay for their uniform.Quote:
Originally Posted by CAJUNSby90
From my understanding they provide apparel and equipment.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ragin9221
Russell Athletics. Champion. Dri-Fit
Amen. Remember those french fleur de lis jerseys? AwesomeQuote:
Originally Posted by Grantvb
You talking about the tri FDL helmetsQuote:
Originally Posted by R1Letterman
I remember when Reebok provided our track spikes and “trainer” running shoes. The spikes were horrible, but those trainer shoes were some of the best grass cutting shoes I ever owned.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grantvb
I wonder how much we paid for them to "provide"
Most fans would prefer to wear Nike apparel.
Would love to see the university align with Nike for once.
Yes Please!Quote:
Originally Posted by Geaux
AgreedQuote:
Originally Posted by CAJUNSby90