Say what you will, but of the 21 HS kids committed to both schools on 247, all 21 of Techs kids are 3 stars and only 13 of ours are. And I know, I know....stars shmars. But if it were the other way around we'd be tooting our horns.
Printable View
Say what you will, but of the 21 HS kids committed to both schools on 247, all 21 of Techs kids are 3 stars and only 13 of ours are. And I know, I know....stars shmars. But if it were the other way around we'd be tooting our horns.
LaTurd has a 247 site and representation. We do not.Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesTheJeweler
TouchèQuote:
Originally Posted by cajun4life
if it is a Laturd rivals site, it is probably owned by a tech fan and slanted in its reporting to put tech in a good lightQuote:
Originally Posted by Big Poppa
Guys…it’s quite simple. Louisiana has better rated HS players than LaTech in this class. LaTech has a ton of legit transfers…we don’t. Slice it however you want.
100%Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunT
I’m definitely ok with our class. 4th in the SBC.
Napier was rated first in the belt every year if I recall. At least the last 3 for sure.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Buds
Napier recruited at the highest level we have ever experienced. We are essentially back to a pre-Napier level. Not bad, but not great....Mediocre. Coach Des can't lean on an experience that was at the highest levels of College football. He's going to have to do with winning games, those that we are not expected to win, and lots of them.
That was also without Southern Miss, JMU, Marshall and ODU. If you think we are in the same conference as then, I got some oceanfront property in Arizona to sell you.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Poppa
With that said, I would question you on his first two classes without searching, but you’re probably right. Not saying we can’t do better but some people here were crying about our class a few weeks ago. The sky is not falling.
He finished 5th his first season, I think he finished #1 the next 2 seasons.Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Buds