Wallerstedt denies sharing Texas Tech signals

Not good

They are 3-7, give up 40+ points per game, and they haven't changed things up? Sounds like a big fat excuse to me. It may be more but it took two months to come out?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ManAboutTown

That's why he wasn't immediately hired.. Hudspeth wanted to see how things shook out. And you're telling me that we knew he was accused of giving out signals (a death sentence in small coaching circle) and we STILL brought him on board? Not only does this sound like a "friendly" deal, it wreaks of arrogance. Did Hud have issues with Saunders as well? Wth is going on?? If any of this is proven to be true, huge embarrassment for the staff and Matt W has got to go!

---

Why the "ifs?"

Sounds like you've got it all figured out.

Not a good look!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunRage

They are 3-7, give up 40+ points per game, and they haven't changed things up? Sounds like a big fat excuse to me. It may be more but it took two months to come out?

---

That's my theory also ... they need to worry about more than their signals.

Some of you would make really s---ty jurors.

How about we get all the facts first before we gather the pitchforks and torches?

Could we please wait to see what shakes out before finding a new rope and a good tree?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by basinbear

Could we please wait to see what shakes out before finding a new rope and a good tree?

---

It will be hard to find a rope in Louisiana after the 2 lsu losses

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajun_lannister

It will be hard to find a rope in Louisiana after the 2 lsu losses

---

You may have a point....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by scotto_25

It was apparently reported to Texas Tech by Charlie Strong

---

What does it say about Charlie Stongs staff for taking them and usiing them? There is much missing from this story including how bad this makes Klingsbury and his current DC look as well. So you push out your DC using a story about his personal behavior, but you keep his defense and the signals he used? This has personal annimosity and bad blood written all over it. I don't know Wallerstedt well enough to defend his supposed actions and if he broke this unwritten rule in football coach etiquette then he will suffer the consequences. But something tells me both parties will have mud on their faces when everything is put on the table.

And please, for those that keep mentioning the Saunders conspiracy, let it go! There is nothing remotely true about it!