Re: Rivalry kindled today at ULM
We hear the same smack every year when we play ULM on this board. "Its not a rivalry." That's basically playing what many would call the elitist role. They are a rivalry at least in football and baseball.
-We do recruit the same players. They have gotten players that we wanted and likewise.
-We play them every year and our record has been less than spectacular.
-They stole a couple of our letters when naming their school
I dont care if they ever had a great program a few years back when we may or may not have played them. Rivalries are forged every year. Do we consider McNeese a rivalry even though they are 1-AA (FCS to be politically correct)?
Some people want to call the matchup of LSU and UL a rivalry, I sure as hell do. But you know damn well sure that people in the Puke and Gold wanna look down on us and not call it anything more than a nuisance.
Call it what you want, but this topic is brought up every year and I hate it. We are rivals with ULM, with LaTex, with LSU, with McNeese. Just because they dont compete at our level in some sports makes it less likely to be called a rivalry. I hate these schools when we compete against them more than other schools. I'm sick of getting beaten by those * in maroon and gold.
Bottom line, who ever lines up across from us is the team I hate. Just some more than others tho!
Re: Rivalry kindled today at ULM
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wcd35
_ We hear the same smack every year when we play ULM on this board. "Its not a rivalry." That's basically playing what many would call the elitist role. They are a rivalry at least in football and baseball.
-We do recruit the same players. They have gotten players that we wanted and likewise.
-We play them every year and our record has been less than spectacular.
-They stole a couple of our letters when naming their school
I dont care if they ever had a great program a few years back when we may or may not have played them. Rivalries are forged every year. Do we consider McNeese a rivalry even though they are 1-AA (FCS to be politically correct)?
Some people want to call the matchup of LSU and UL a rivalry, I sure as hell do. But you know damn well sure that people in the Puke and Gold wanna look down on us and not call it anything more than a nuisance.
Call it what you want, but this topic is brought up every year and I hate it. We are rivals with ULM, with LaTex, with LSU, with McNeese. Just because they dont compete at our level in some sports makes it less likely to be called a rivalry. I hate these schools when we compete against them more than other schools. I'm sick of getting beaten by those * in maroon and gold.
Bottom line, who ever lines up across from us is the team I hate. Just some more than others tho! _
See post #11
Re: Rivalry kindled today at ULM
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zeebart21
_ See post #11 _
Damn you Z and your quick, and pre-my post, wit that I may have subconsciously stole!
Someone once said, "If you type a lot more words than another man, that means you are smarter...or less smarterer."
Re: Rivalry kindled today at ULM
Quote:
Originally Posted by
wcd35
_ Damn you Z and your quick, and pre-my post, wit that I may have subconsciously stole!
Someone once said, "If you type a lot more words than another man, that means you are smarter...or less smarterer." _
Trust me when I say, there is a distinct possibility I may be the unsmarterestest person on this board. If you spent any time at all on the old Delphi board, you also may recall Tiger fan accusing me of being, "The biggest moron of them all"
Z
Re: Bustle Job Security.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Frenchie35
_ He can get canned without any pay......so win baby, win...... _
Frenchie, you are mistaken. Bustle has 2 years left on his contract. We release him, we then owe him about $370,000. Not a pleasant thought for a poor boy like myself.
The glass is half full and not half empty. Think positive.
.~..~..~.
Re: Rivalry kindled today at ULM
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Parrott
_ I don't believe I fell for any "hype" concerning this game.
Players and coaches on both sides expressed interest in bringing back the trophy for this game. And you might not believe it's a "rivalry" game, but ULM is the closest thing UL currently has to a "rival" on the schedule year-in, year-out, and vice-versa.
Again, just ask the players and coaches from both sides. Their words carry this story.
Sorry you guys don't agree. _
I judge the rivalry question by how I feel when the Cajuns lose a particular game. I feel pretty much the same when the Cajuns win, unless its a big win like tying for the championship or the recent win over Houston. Of course, I always feel bad when the Cajuns lose. However, it is especially rough when we lose to ULM, LaTech, or McNeese. I wasn't around for the old McNeese rivalry, but that recent loss to them was pure pain. In terms of how I feel after a loss, I would call each of these rivals, and rank them as follows: ULM, McNeese, LaTech. NW State doesn't seem to fit in that group. ULM moreso than the other two because of the conference. Off topic a bit, I wish we would have played McNeese again this year. Maybe get a little redemption for the seniors, plus the crowd was nice.
When the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor...
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Just1More
_ It's only "the fans" fault, now, if they fail to demand an improvement plan from Dr. S. You can never achieve success by blaming the customer. Know it and never forget it, or continue to lose. It is one of the laws of business physics.
First, there are always 5-10% fanship that show up win, lose or draw (God Bless them). There are another 15% that might show up on occasion and possibly in the wake of some hype... but they are fickle and leave easily. The 75% that you see filling the stands in successful programs are there only if they believe they have associated themselves with something that they can wear the emblem and not be laughed at. They are there for pure entertainment. I want all of them to participate, and it will require ratcheting up our program, starting with the leader.
There is no program on record that has badgered, belittled, begged and belittled their fanbase into anything successful. Any analysis of programs in a similar state to UL that have succeeded have done so thru excellent leadership at the top of the institution. They have operated the program like a business. The large financial backers are like banking institutions (not the recent variety, but those more responsible with their money). Bankers (fans with money) want to see a business plan ripe with investment rewards. Not BS. Not, please, please can I have the money. A plan, with management's skin on the line. They already give "fun money" to the program, for minor advertisement and local citizen guilt avoidance therapy.
We might keep rolling the same old worn out pair of dice and see some success... who knows? If we are going to actually move in the direction of sustained success, we are going to have to see some fundamental changes to the UL football program constitution. That requires initiation from the chief.
The biggest component to the new plan is a commitment to have disgusting football staff salaries available with a hook that states "instant death penalty for results unbecoming a program paying these high prices". Young, incredibly gifted and eager upstart coaches will take the opportunity and will succeed. That plan, and that plan alone will get Daddy Warbucks on the board of UL funding. Nothing else... sorry. Law of business physics trumps the wishing well every single time. _
Customer? What customer? To be a customer, you have to believe in and purchase something...
The "customers" have not bought into this thing enough to even pay a competetive coach's salary...
I probably do not understand your post, but many UL fans sound an awful lot like a punk employee that demands a raise before he is going to put forth the effort and do what it takes to earn one...
We as fans have to step up to the plate and put forth the financial effort before we get the "raise" in level of performance from the program...not the other way around. We are the "buyers", and as such we have an important role in "business physics" as well, we pop for the cash. The "buying" generally occurs prior to the "delivering of goods"...
I agree that their needs to be a plan to go along with the stepping up to the plate, but both have to occur...
Some folks seem to have selective amnesia... The new enhancements to facilities was not here when Bustle arrived, in fact they were not really here until the end of 2007 or even beginning of 2008. Fortunately the coaching staff did not stand around with their teeth in their mouth waiting for this epiphony, they have been hard at work building a solid team as us "buyer's" try to get our proverbial act together...
As far as Coach Bustle is concerned, we have been paying him a 3 win salary, he can kick back and play some golf if he gets the W next week because he will have delivered what we have compensated him for :-) If the man gets us to a bowl game, to hell with extending his "3 win" contract, double his freakin salary...
"Up and coming" is where we want to be, and by God I think we are headed there...
Re: Bustle Job Security.....
I'd say Bustle's "hot seat" cooled down several degrees after the ULM game. Now we need a minimum of 5 more wins. Barring excessive injury, if this team can keep its focus, they have a chance. .~.
Offense Ignites, Explodes in Triumph at ULM
Offense Ignites, Explodes in Triumph at ULM
Quote:
<blockquote><p align=justify>
Tyrell Fenroy set the school record for rushing yards in a single game with 297. As a team, UL posted a school-record 728 yards total offense.
MONROE - Louisiana’s Ragin’ Cajuns used big play after big play to make sure the team came out on top in its 2008 Sun Belt Conference opener Saturday at Malone Stadium.
The biggest of plays came in response to ULM trimming the lead to two points with 5:42 remaining. Tyrell Fenroy took a handoff and rolled 80 yards to pay dirt for the final score in the Cajuns 44-35 triumph.
UL (2-3, 1-0 Sun Belt) scored on six plays longer than 50 yards, but needed that one last big play to hold off the Warhawks and Fenroy was able to deliver with his third score of the contest.
Fenroy led all players with 297 yards rushing, his third straight game with at least 180 yards on the ground and his first career 200-yard outing. Fenroy broke Brian Mitchell’s school record for rushing in a single game and moved within 30 yards of overtaking Patrick Cobbs as the Sun Belt Conference’s all-time leading rusher. His career rushing total is up to 4,021 – the first player in Cajuns history to surpass 4,000 yards rushing.
Michael Desormeaux topped 100 yards rushing for the third time this season, as he ended the night with 149 yards on 10 carries.
In a night of offensive explosion for Louisiana, the Ragin’ Cajuns set the school record for team rushing yards with 556 and total offense with 728 total yards on 60 plays. It’s the second time this season (667 vs. Kent State, Sept. 20) UL breaks the school record for total offense.
The Cajuns extended their lead in the first four minutes of the second half thanks to a pair of big plays. Jason Chery raced 87 yards for a touchdown on the second play of the half and then Chery caught a 74-yard pass from Desormeaux to give UL a 27-9 lead at the 11:07 mark of the third quarter.
The Warhawks wasted no time getting back into the game, traveling 74 yards in just four plays, scoring on a three-yard run from Darrell McNeal.
The Cajuns punched back, going 78 yards in five plays, scoring on a 52-yard run by Fenroy. The key play of the drive came two plays earlier, as Desormeaux hit Richie Falgout with a 15-yard strike on third-and-nine from Cajuns 23-yard line.
UL’s defense fed off the scoring barrage, registering sacks by Lanier Coleman and Hall Davis on the next possession to force a ULM punt.
After a three-and-out by the Cajuns offense, ULM again made it a game thanks to a four-play, 74-yard scoring drive. Frank Goodin ended the 1:06 drive with a four-yard score. Radi Jabour missed the PAT to keep the Cajuns lead at 34-22 with 1:51 to play in the third quarter.
ULM grabbed the momentum after Greg James returned Desormeaux’s second interception of the game 55 yards for a touchdown. The hosts now trailed just 34-29 with 14:49 remaining in the game.
After the teams swapped defensive stops, Desormeaux broke free on a 46-yard run on third-and-nine from the Cajuns’ 41-yard line to put UL in scoring position. Edmiston tacked on three points with 7:36 remaining to up the Louisiana advantage to 37-29.
A personal foul penalty on the ensuing kickoff set up ULM at their own 45 yard line. Trey Revell and Goodin combined to rush for 55 yards over 1:54 to draw the Warhawks within two points at 5:42. Revell’s pass intended for Zeek Zacharie on the two-point conversion was incomplete.
The Ragin’ Cajuns wasted no time, as their next offensive play was the 80-yard Fenroy touchdown rush which upped the lead to 44-35 with 5:20 left to play.
Fenroy is now just 250 rushing yards from becoming the seventh player in NCAA history with four 1,000-yard seasons.
The UL defense forced a three-and-out on the first two ULM possessions of the game, but a specials team’s miscue gave the Warhawks the ball on the UL 34-yard line. Facing a fourth-and-one, ULM settled for a 42-yard field from Jabour to take a 3-0 lead at 6:48 of the opening quarter.
The Cajuns took over on their 11-yard line after a penalty on the ensuing kickoff. On the first play of the drive, Fenroy broke the longest run from scrimmage in Malone Stadium history and the second longest run in Cajuns history. His 89-yard touchdown jaunt was the longest scoring run at UL and gave the Cajuns a 6-3 lead. Drew Edmiston missed the point after.
Desormeaux’s 64-yard touchdown run put the Cajuns in front 13-3 nine seconds into the second frame. The run capped a seven-play, 95-yard scoring drive for the Cajuns in which Desormeaux was 3-for-3 passing for 20 yards, accounting for 84 yards of offense.
ULM then came back with an 11-play, 56-yard scoring drive that ended with a 19-yard field goal by Jabour at the 2:48 mark. The hosts faced a first-and-goal at the Cajuns one-yard line, but the UL defense stuffed three straight rushing plays to hold the Warhawks out of the end zone.
After a quick three-and-out by the Cajuns offense, ULM got the ball back on their 27-yard line with 1:15 to play in the first half and two timeouts. The Warhawks marched 51 yards in 10 plays, adding another Jabour field goal to cut the Cajuns lead to 13-9 at the half.
The Ragin’ Cajuns conclude their three-game road swing next Saturday as they visit Fouts Field in Denton, Texas, for a meeting with North Texas at 6 p.m. UL returns to Cajun Field on Oct. 18 for a meeting with Arkansas State at 6 p.m.
<center><p><a href="http://www.ragincajuns.com//ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=15400&ATCLID=1596400" target="_blank">RaginCajuns.com</a>
Ragin' Cajuns take historic step for program
Quote:
<blockquote><p align=justify>
It takes more than the final numbers to fully appreciate what happened here at Malone Stadium on Saturday night. Because, in truth - and you can admit it, too - none of us saw this coming after Southern Miss embarrassed UL by 30 points in the season-opener.
There aren't statistics for defining moments - just dates. So remember Oct. 4, 2008 and Cajuns 44, UL Monroe 35.
It's the night that a program on the brink arrived.
"I think it could be," said UL wrecking ball Tyrell Fenroy, who set the program record for rushing yards in a game with 297 to go along with three breathtaking TD sprints of 89, 80 and 52 yards. "Tonight, things that would hurt us in the past, the adversity, we got past that. We kept our heads up and kept playing - kept playing with heart and overcoming those things.
"I was very proud of our team. There's no way around it - this was a very big game for us."
<center><p><a href="http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081005/SPORTS/810050327/1006" target="_blank">The rest of the story</a>
Bob Heist • bheist@theadvertiser.com • October 5, 2008
(337) 289-6402
<!--
And don't look now, but a team that had won just six of its previous 23 games - and only one of six against ULM - is for real. And super glue a chili pepper to the list of contenders this year for the Sun Belt Conference title. Honest.
Can you say New Orleans Bowl? Yikes!
UL won against Monroe despite a list of all the things that have made this such a frustrating team to follow - questionable play-calling, penalties and turnovers topping the list.
It would have been nice if it didn't have to be that way, but it was. And UL survived.
"We put together three great games (against Illinois, Kent State and Kansas State), and I do believe that our players know now that we'll flip the page on this game that we played tonight and we'll flip the gauge back to zero and get ready for the next one," UL coach Rickey Bustle said. "It doesn't matter who you're playing, you've got to play your best game.
"We've preached it, they've bought into it and they're seeing the results that are happening."
We can debate play-calling against Monroe that limited Fenroy to six carries in the first half. Those 113 yards at halftime should have been more.
We can debate a team with a 34-16 lead not making the belly of ULM's defense pay by ramming the greatest running back in school history at it time and time again. Heck, let Mike Desormeaux keep the ball on the zone option - not throw a 55-yard pick for a score on an ill-advised out-route that allowed the Warhawks to make a game of it.
That, though, is water under the dam for one reason: UL's self-imposed adversity only created more resolve. And that resolve brought victory.
Who'd have thunk that the worst road trip in the Sun Belt could bring these kinds of results.
"We started off the season on a real poor note, but then we re-committed ourselves," Desormeaux said. "We believe (what happened at Southern Miss) wasn't us. We were embarrassed ... and then (Illinois and Kansas); moral victories are really non-existent in football, a loss is still a loss, but we looked at the film and saw some really good things we were doing. We just tried to carry it over.
"Tonight, we did that, and I don't think it can be overstated how big this win was. Now, all we can do is keep building on this and keep gaining momentum. If we do that, who know where that will take us."
-->