Football Season: Reasons to be negative.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

Don't deflect...I didn't say that at all. I said...no one can check your ___ for the comments you just made. Good to see you come clean. I've been called to the carpet for supporting Hud, then realizing what was going on. That's what happens here. It's not about who is a real fan, it's who can come here...run their mouth...and then back it up. T can. What can you do?

So you are accusing T of lying to further his cause. From someone who was around in public, and in private...that's a lie. You need to come to the table with something better if you are going to make accusations of a man of T's stature. Right now, all you have is baseless accusations based on an argument.

---

Sucks when someone misinterprets what you say? Or when they change the subject completely? Put words in your mouth? I never accused of him anything...you said he was saying things in private chats that differ from what he said here. T needs to actually read what people write before telling them they are wrong. He read something that wasn't there and as usual tried to be the "I know something you don't guy" a simple, I misread your post would have been the end of it but instead he tried to change the subject completely to not appear that he was wrong. Sorry if I call things like I see it. Call it what you want, and I never brought his son in this...you did...but when he was reporting on recruiting they were some of the best recruits we ever had...when he stopped covering we had no talent, those players were no longer good enough and hud can't recruit. At some point he was wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hark Mudspeth

Sucks when someone misinterprets what you say? Or when they change the subject completely? Put words in your mouth? I never accused of him anything...you said he was saying things in private chats that differ from what he said here. T needs to actually read what people write before telling them they are wrong. He read something that wasn't there and as usual tried to be the "I know something you don't guy" a simple, I misread your post would have been the end of it but instead he tried to change the subject completely to not appear that he was wrong. Sorry if I call things like I see it. Call it what you want, and I never brought his son in this...you did...but when he was reporting on recruiting they were some of the best recruits we ever had...when he stopped covering we had no talent, those players were no longer good enough and hud can't recruit. At some point he was wrong.

---

You have accused him of something. It's right there in several of your posts saying he supported Hud, and fed us positive recruiting information, all while not believing it to stay in the "lucrative" recruiting business, and only changed his mind once it was all over. You said that...it's right there. Post #94.

And you were never right. The only point you ever made was "well not doing something is not a prerequisite for doing something." I added the word prerequisite. T disagreed. You took it to another level once he didn't acquiesce. He called you a big Hud fan. You attacked the man's integrity. Tell me now how you are on the moral high ground here?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

You have accused him of something. It's right there in several of your posts saying he supported Hud, and fed us positive recruiting information, all while not believing it to stay in the "lucrative" recruiting business, and only changed his mind once it was all over. You said that...it's right there. Post #94.

And you were never right. The only point you ever made was "well not doing something is not a prerequisite for doing something." I added the word prerequisite. T disagreed. You took it to another level once he didn't acquiesce. He called you a big Hud fan. You attacked the man's integrity. Tell me now how you are on the moral high ground here?

---

Never claimed to be on moral high ground and if me calling T on his bullsht is attacking the man's integrity then so be it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Hark Mudspeth

Never claimed to be on moral high ground and if me calling T on his bullsht is attacking the man's integrity then so be it.

---

Of course you never claimed it...you like to be vague so no one can call you for what you are. You like to shapeshift so that you never seem like a twat. I do the same ____. You can't ____ a ____ter, boy. As for T's integrity...you know nothing about him. All you know is that he doesn't agree with your bull____, simple ___, statement. All we know is that you resent him for what he did for us recruiting wise. All because he called you a Hud fan. So...that cardboard cutout of Hud with the mouth hole you have sex with? How tight are his sleeves?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

Of course you never claimed it...you like to be vague so no one can call you for what you are. You like to shapeshift so that you never seem like a twat. I do the same ____. You can't ____ a ____ter, boy. As for T's integrity...you know nothing about him. All you know is that he doesn't agree with your bull____, simple ___, statement. All we know is that you resent him for what he did for us recruiting wise. All because he called you a Hud fan. So...that cardboard cutout of Hud with the mouth hole you have sex with? How tight are his sleeves?

---

Nope, I was pretty clear in my original statement and stared it clearly every time after that. I quite literally meant exactly what I wrote. I don't resent him, just think he is FOS and enjoyed being "the guy" when he was no longer "the guy" his attitude, opinion and posts changed drastically. Make of that what you will.

Does Amazon sell hair splitters?

No., I interpreted you to be saying past performance over a long history should not be a predictor of the future. People have been telling you it's absolutely a predictor. It's like the turnover battle, the error battle

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunEXPRESS

No., I interpreted you to be saying past performance over a long history should not be a predictor of the future. People have been telling you it's absolutely a predictor. It's like the turnover battle, the error battle

---

And you interpreted wrong which is ok. Wasn't what I was saying at all and explained that several times. Wasn't long ago we had never had a RB rush for a thousand yards...saying he couldn't do it because you think he wouldn't stay healthy or the line sucked or he wouldn't get enough carries is a prediction of the future based on the past. Saying he couldn't rush for a 1000 yards because no RB had ever done it before isn't a valid point in my opinion . If you disagree that's fine too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

Of course you never claimed it...you like to be vague so no one can call you for what you are. You like to shapeshift so that you never seem like a twat. I do the same ____. You can't ____ a ____ter, boy. As for T's integrity...you know nothing about him. All you know is that he doesn't agree with your bull____, simple ___, statement. All we know is that you resent him for what he did for us recruiting wise. All because he called you a Hud fan. So...that cardboard cutout of Hud with the mouth hole you have sex with? How tight are his sleeves?

---

Cajun T street cred is significant.. Trust me on this. enough that Hudd will do anything to silence his TRUTH at all cost. T has more respect around Reinhardt Drive than Hud does. Makes the Hud supporters nervous... As well as Hudd.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Turbine

Does Amazon sell hair splitters?

---

I see it's not ok to question someone's sexuality, but to outright call them full of ____ is ok. Never change Turbine.