Originally Posted by GoneGolfin
Thanks for the kind words (as you always provide). I understand the point you are trying to make.
Rankings are not just "very much" subjective but *are entirely* subjective. But if it were a requirement that everyone see every team play (and how many times?), you would not have rankings. This is simply not feasible. By your own criteria, you have no justification for the Cajuns being in the Top 25. How many teams have you seen play in your, say, Top 40? And how many times have you seen those teams play? I have only seen about half of those teams play thus far this season. And I watch a lot of college ball. Incidentally, I also listen to a larger number of teams. Some other writers also take this approach.
The bottom line is that the analysis of raw results must play a large part in assessing the realtive strength of a team. You can then analyze these results against teams you have seen play, in order to form an opinion. This is necessary because you cannot see every team play every game.
Day one for the RPI has not even begun. Just because it is published does not mean it is a useful tool yet. We have talked about this in the past.
The RPI is still a poor measuring stick. Do not forget what the RPI really is. The RPI is primarily (75%) the strength of your schedule. By using the RPI as an argument, you just contradicted your earlier assertion concerning Long Beach State being in the Top 25. LBSU is #2 in the latest SEBaseball Adjusted RPI (#3 in Base RPI). Why are they this high? Because of their SOS.
I believe that there is some bias w/respect to the larger schools. I would not confine it to the West and SEC. But I do not think the bias is that strong overall. I do think that the rankings by the West are correct at this point. I think you get less bias in some of the writer polls (other than BA and CB). I think that the real bias with BA is not the big school syndrome, but the projection of professional talent tunnel vision (POPTTV - OK, I made up that acronym).
As for Kentucky, I was hard on Kentucky this season for playing such a weak schedule. But the Wildcats are 3-2-1 against Arkansas and LSU. Not bad. LSU did not take a single game this past weekend. Kentucky did better against LSU on the road than South Carolina did against LSU at home. And Kentucky *did not* struggle to beat LSU on Friday night (winning 16-2). LSU may be having a down year, but they are not a bad team. They are still in the running for an NCAA bid. Remember that this LSU team also took 2/3 from Southern Mississippi.
I may or may not have Kentucky in the Top 25. But I have not seen anything yet that makes UL an obvious pick over Kentucky. The Cajuns have not played many top teams either (actually, fewer than Kentucky). They will get a chance to prove themselves at ASU.
That alone does not mean Top 25. This is entirely subjective and I am not convinced this is the case. The 2002 team *may* have been better and they were not a consensus Top 25 team. Besides, this is a different year entirely. In other words, the benchmark is different. You can have a Top 15 team one year that would not be a Top 25 in another.
What we have to go on thus far is performance to this point. Based on that, I see a few more than 25 teams ahead of the Cajuns. If the Cajuns go 4-0 this week, depending on what happens to some of the other teams, that could change.
Keep supporting the Cajuns!
Brian