Perfect Game Projected Field of 64

I don't see this posted anywhere. Pardon if this a duplicate. They have us opposite LSU.

LAFAYETTE, LA.
1. Louisiana-Lafayette* (6)
4. Southeastern La.*

2. Ole Miss
3. New Mexico*

BATON ROUGE, LA.
1. LSU
4. Southeast Missouri*

2. Oregon
3. Wake Forest

http://www.perfectgame.org/(S(0wm44c...x?article=9776

That would be insane! I am going to be in Hawaii the week of the Supers...that would be a tough one to miss!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dad04

I don't see this posted anywhere. Pardon if this a duplicate. They have us opposite LSU.

LAFAYETTE, LA.
1. Louisiana-Lafayette* (6)
4. Southeastern La.*

2. Ole Miss
3. New Mexico*

BATON ROUGE, LA.
1. LSU
4. Southeast Missouri*

2. Oregon
3. Wake Forest

http://www.perfectgame.org/(S(0wm44c...x?article=9776

---

-----Just wondering why we get the close teams and LSU the distant ones--much harder travel and ergo an advantage!!!

If we were a national seed, wouldn't we be playing one of the worse 4 seeds? I think Southeastern may be even good to be a 3 seed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunRage

If we were a national seed, wouldn't we be playing one of the worse 4 seeds? I think Southeastern may be even good to be a 3 seed.

---

Technically, I don't think the teams are seeded beyond #8 national seed.

We refer to them as seeds, and they pretty much are... but I don't think there's officially a #2, #3, and #4 seed in the regional.

Could be remembering wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Boomer

-----Just wondering why we get the close teams and LSU the distant ones--much harder travel and ergo an advantage!!!

---

Whomever travels to Lafayette will have a difficult time getting tickets...near or far.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dad04

Whomever travels to Lafayette will have a difficult time getting tickets...near or far.

---

Which is why treehouses must be built!

I think it was 92 and I sat up in one of the trees for about 5 innings until the UPs finally spotted me and I had to leave.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CajunJack55

Which is why treehouses must be built!

---

Maybe Phase 2 of the Master Plan can be amended.

http://www.thisiscolossal.com/wp-con.../06/tree-1.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by jllanclos

Technically, I don't think the teams are seeded beyond #8 national seed.

We refer to them as seeds, and they pretty much are... but I don't think there's officially a #2, #3, and #4 seed in the regional.

Could be remembering wrong.

---

Each regional has a 1-4 seed, so yes every team is seeded, and I agree SE would be a damn tough 4 seed. This projection is still laughable considering they are giving CS Fullerton a #3 seed at large… Those guys should just pack their bags now and rest for the post season because I have a strange feeling they will be "rewarded" one of the 64 teams in the tourney despite their terrible season because of the name on their chest…

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by campo118

Each regional has a 1-4 seed, so yes every team is seeded, and I agree SE would be a damn tough 4 seed. This projection is still laughable considering they are giving CS Fullerton a #3 seed at large… Those guys should just pack their bags now and rest for the post season because I have a strange feeling they will be "rewarded" one of the 64 teams in the tourney despite their terrible season because of the name on their chest…

---

They are a 3 seed in a regional. If you are going by "seeding" that means they are one of the top 48 teams in the tournament. With an RPI of 56 and most 4 seeds being bad conference winners, I think that is the right place for them. Making them a host or a 2 seed would be the laughable offense.

Couldn't disagree more. While you are correct, conference champions take up most of the #4 seeds, name me another team with an RPI of 56 (which is only going to drop with their remaining schedule) who was awarded an at-large. I'll wait...