So far we have 11 3 star, plus 5 nationally ranked 2 stars

3 stars so far, that I could verify......(list doesn't include transfers)
Alexander ESPN & Rivals
Landor ESPN
Haack ESPN & Rivals
D Jones ESPN
Batiste ESPN
Fourquier ESPN
Mosby Rivals
Bilich Rivals
Sparks Rivals
Bates Rivals
Jackson Rivals

5 Nationally Ranked 2 stars in ESPN: Morgan S #99, Brunson OT #194, Tarver OT #197, Hill OLB #183, Lightfoot ILB #70.

If I missed any......please feel free to add to list.

PP #2

Boomer should have stars in his eyes now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Policarp

3 stars so far, that I could verify......(list doesn't include transfers)
Alexander ESPN & Rivals
Landor ESPN
Haack ESPN & Rivals
D Jones ESPN
Batiste ESPN
Fourquier ESPN
Mosby Rivals
Bilich Rivals
Sparks Rivals
Bates Rivals
Jackson Rivals

5 Nationally Ranked 2 stars in ESPN: Morgan S #99, Brunson OT #194, Tarver OT #197, Hill OLB #183, Lightfoot ILB #70.

If I missed any......please feel free to add to list.

PP #2

---

Whether you "missed" any depends on which service you quote. Rivals also has us with only 13 commits so its hard for me to go by what they say. I choose to look at ESPN for our rankings and such as they update the status much more often

Why is Scout so hard to give stars??? Like hardly any 3 stars and our 2 star guys are 3 stars on other services!!!

I believe Scout & ESPN caps the number of 3 stars at a specific number. Rivals for some of the early evalued players is fine, then it quickly turns into complete BS. Then they keep adding and adding 3 stars with a bias to schools that have active Rivals boards. Example: As soon as Tech offerred Wil Freeman, 3-4 days later what do you know.......he's edited to a 3 star prospect in Rivals. So completely predictable it's laughable. Same happened for Noland when he committed to Tech and their Juco WR. For Tech recruits on Rivals, post action editing has become highly predictable. Any edited to 3 stars after the fact are completely bogus ratings. In the end, you have to trust Scout and ESPN rankings the most.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Policarp

I believe Scout & ESPN caps the number of 3 stars at a specific number. Rivals for some of the early evalued players is fine, then it quickly turns into complete BS. Then they keep adding and adding 3 stars with a bias to schools that have active Rivals boards. Example: As soon as Tech offerred Wil Freeman, 3-4 days later what do you know.......he's edited to a 3 star prospect in Rivals. So completely predictable it's laughable. Same happened for Noland when he committed to Tech and their Juco WR. For Tech recruits on Rivals, post action editing has become highly predictable. Any edited to 3 stars after the fact are completely bogus ratings. In the end, you have to trust Scout and ESPN rankings the most.

---

Your list is comprised of all Rivals and ESPN rankings. Scout does not have any of our commits as 3 star players and Rivals only has us with 13 total commits last I looked a day or so ago. I think ESPN is the only service that has updated our counts with any type of consistency

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Policarp

3 stars so far, that I could verify......(list doesn't include transfers)
Alexander ESPN & Rivals
Landor ESPN
Haack ESPN & Rivals
D Jones ESPN
Batiste ESPN
Fourquier ESPN
Mosby Rivals
Bilich Rivals
Sparks Rivals
Bates Rivals
Jackson Rivals

5 Nationally Ranked 2 stars in ESPN: Morgan S #99, Brunson OT #194, Tarver OT #197, Hill OLB #183, Lightfoot ILB #70.

If I missed any......please feel free to add to list.

PP #2

---

I would trust BJ as our recruiting authority.