Ragin' Cajun Blog: Football ready for recruiting weekend (Jan. 13)

My blog looking ahead to a big recruiting weekend:

http://www.theadvertiser.com/apps/pb...Id=personaDest

I love Montrell's quote when given the context that we decided not to offer him. Funny stuff.

Thanks for the article. This is sort of non-recruiting related, but does anyone have any Kevis Streeter updates?

Speaking to a Tech alum the other day, and I had hoped we would back off of Conner. The running backs we already have are very very strong. The Carter kid, bring him in, thats 4 possibly five years we get him. Whereas Conner, he would have to share time with Spikes and Walker. I don't think running back is an area of tremendous need. Especially if Streeter can make it back to the field. I like the idea of taking in a highly touted freshamn like Carter.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

_ Speaking to a Tech alum the other day, and I had hoped we would back off of Conner. The running backs we already have are very very strong. The Carter kid, bring him in, thats 4 possibly five years we get him. Whereas Conner, he would have to share time with Spikes and Walker. I don't think running back is an area of tremendous need. Especially if Streeter can make it back to the field. I like the idea of taking in a highly touted freshamn like Carter. _

---

Tie in the Tech alum lead please.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

_ Speaking to a Tech alum the other day, and I had hoped we would back off of Conner. The running backs we already have are very very strong. The Carter kid, bring him in, thats 4 possibly five years we get him. Whereas Conner, he would have to share time with Spikes and Walker. I don't think running back is an area of tremendous need. Especially if Streeter can make it back to the field. I like the idea of taking in a highly touted freshamn like Carter. _

---

Carter is not recruited for RB

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

Speaking to a Tech alum the other day, and I had hoped we would back off of Conner. The running backs we already have are very very strong. The Carter kid, bring him in, thats 4 possibly five years we get him. Whereas Conner, he would have to share time with Spikes and Walker. I don't think running back is an area of tremendous need. Especially if Streeter can make it back to the field. I like the idea of taking in a highly touted freshamn like Carter.

---

I sure think we could use a kick returner.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

Speaking to a Tech alum the other day, and I had hoped we would back off of Conner. The running backs we already have are very very strong. The Carter kid, bring him in, thats 4 possibly five years we get him. Whereas Conner, he would have to share time with Spikes and Walker. I don't think running back is an area of tremendous need. Especially if Streeter can make it back to the field. I like the idea of taking in a highly touted freshamn like Carter.

---

Carter is being recruited primarily as receiver and kick returner.

igeaux.mobi

My mistake...still I think running back is not an area of need for us this year.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by cajunhawk

_ Speaking to a Tech alum the other day, and I had hoped we would back off of Conner. The running backs we already have are very very strong. The Carter kid, bring him in, thats 4 possibly five years we get him. Whereas Conner, he would have to share time with Spikes and Walker. I don't think running back is an area of tremendous need. Especially if Streeter can make it back to the field. I like the idea of taking in a highly touted freshamn like Carter. _

---

RB is always an area of tremendous need. The two players you mentioned are small and one has not proven he is a D1 RB yet. If Streeter cannot make it back fully, we will have a lot of playing time to offer. Conner looks like he will not be the guy, but we could use another playmaker back there.