Two Strikes and a Philosophy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
talktomewillis
That doesn't shock me and perhaps I can give an answer.
Part of the new philosophy is to quit swinging at bad pitches, especially early in the count. But even late in the count, a batter is going to take a close pitch if he feels it's not a pitch in his zone. As a result, you'll see more called third strikes, especially early in the season. I would expect this number will decrease as the season progresses.
That is seriously a 2 strike hitting philosophy? Take a pitch and hope the umpire doesn't ring you up? Man, the game has changed...
Re: Two Strikes and a Philosophy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
talktomewillis
That doesn't shock me and perhaps I can give an answer.
Part of the new philosophy is to quit swinging at bad pitches, especially early in the count. But even late in the count, a batter is going to take a close pitch if he feels it's not a pitch in his zone. As a result, you'll see more called third strikes, especially early in the season. I would expect this number will decrease as the season progresses.
To the best of your knowledge. What or who is the most successful team using this method?
Re: Two Strikes and a Philosophy
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Turbine
To the best of your knowledge. What or who is the most successful team using this method?
Maybe there isn't one????
Re: Baseball vs Maryland Game 1
Good to see that “stay in your box” approach with 2 strikes in the 9th work out...
Two Strikes and a Philosophy
Am I going to have to start a separate thread about the 2 strike approach?
The silence is deafening. Is it so outrageous that no one will even try to defend it?
Re: Baseball vs Maryland Game 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by
CajunRage
I'm trying to figure it out. We are telling our players to man up and do something but the coaches are using a philosophy that handcuffs them.
What’s the philosophy?